howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
that's right - it doesn't matter whether there is a similar business close by. i will be objecting on the grounds that it is a total eyesore and as the planning coves have passed stuff in the past to ensure that the quality of life in the folkestone road has reached rock bottom they actually owe us one.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
# 141...spot on...
# 148 & 157.....planning committee will vote as ``guided`` by the Officers....
# 150...154...& 155.....must be a LA employee or `closet`
# 156 & 160.....``utterly irrelevant to planning considerations``............ that's the trouble.....look at # 141.......
Guest 651- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 5,673
Reg you have a real problem that I work for a local authority? I don't work in planning and I don't work for DDC !!!
Been nice knowing you :)
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
I have no problem who works for who,
What I have a problem with is this situation is one as howard says the Folkestone road deserves better,
but more importantly either this bloke has broken rules or not
if he hasnt i think the district has a problem now planning isn't required
whole new ball game opening up
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 651- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 5,673
Well Reg does seem to have a problem with the big secret that I work for Ashford Council - shhhhh don't tell anyone........
Been nice knowing you :)
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
I have a problem with some of your postings, but we are all different, and have the right to post(even reg)
my replies are on the application
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,895
Roger, at times it must depend on the mood of those that are responsible for the decision, which depends on whether they are feeling in a positive or negative frame of mind that is unless they have preconceived views which they will not change.
I know my mood sometimes determines how I respond to a post on here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Sadly as we have seen with this application, the officers run the council(peter hope your watching lol)
officers appear to have told roger this guys breaking regs, then change there mind.
Theres a real can of worms opening up
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 782- Registered: 4 Oct 2012
- Posts: 357
Breaking legs now. Where does Roger say that?
This is turning in to something a bit ugly.
What is wrong with officers running the council? After all, is that not what they are there for?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
no legs been mentioned here
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
would that be molly then.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
simon is being mirthful keith.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
with regards to officers running the council no they shouldn't
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
well someones got to do it kieth,but mind you there has to be a good pay packedge to go with it.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
cllrs SHOULD run the council
officers should carry out the cllrs decisions
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 782- Registered: 4 Oct 2012
- Posts: 357
Yes you are right of course Keith, no legs, it says regs! I read it incorrectly even though I haven't yet had any gin (+ min cost per unit!!!), sorry for that. And sorry again to Howard, I wasn't being mirthful this time because I wasn;t using my newly found emoticons. What I was being, is wrong and looking everso slightly like a tit!
Councillors for the most part do not have the time, experience or technical knowledge to be able to run the council. If they did there would be no need for officers. However, within the law and the bounds of what is possible, they should certainly facilitate the will of the people channelled through those elected councillors.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#133, Reg, do you not recall the unfortunate case of one Peter Moulder?
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
that is still a big issue with mr moulder, the problem will not go away.
knocking down his house like that.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
i think thisguy is sticking two fingers up to our elected members
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 652- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 595
this guy has also broken another rule, it comes before planning to install a illuminated sign, this has not been done, planning has been refused on some of these signs, as regards Mr Moulder, there was a building there, before the war built out of corrungated tin, a Mr Mead lived in it, he was killed by enemy action at the end of the shelling, Mr Moulder built round what was there then removed the original, made the whole thing look better, was there when pulled down, great shame
