Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Howard;
i have not said its wrong, i, just telling you what happens
its all swings and roundabouts
charlie/claire wont come on here just to be slagged off why should they(remember i support neither of them)
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 943- Registered: 15 May 2013
- Posts: 449
Good Morning,Ladies and Gentlemen.Hope you have had a good Christmas...
Keith S excellent post#226.Very accurate..You are sorely missed in todays local poltics in Dover..I am not being sarcastic,you clearly know your brief and your old patch..All credit to you..
I am concerned that Reg may have been hacked,some one has been using his name to post on Christmas Day,the special holy day in the Christian world to post obscure references to American wardrobes etc,the tone of some of the posts were very terse and lacking in the spirit of Christmas and there was another clue it was not cuddlesome Reg because none of the posts were cut and past.
Jan H. I agree with your assessment that there is too much political tit for tat and is very off putting to floating voters like you on the Forum..You have said this numerous times over the last few days and I hope everyone takes note in the coming new year..I not being sarcastic or flippant..
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
# 239 Agree.....The logical.common sense,`unbiased`commentary of the `Boss`
is sadly missed.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
peter r
at last seem to have got through
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
PaulB is actually a true socialist, i.e. a holder of honest opinions, untainted by party dogma and unswayed by media sensationalism. Having been a meeja bloke for years he knows what a lot of crap it all is. I would not say his posts are unbiased,but at least the bias is intellectual rather than party political.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Agree.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
David Cameron urged to soften tone on immigration
Conservative modernisers have urged David Cameron to tone down his harsh language on immigration and welfare because they believe it is alienating voters.
The Bright Blue group, a cheerleader for Mr Cameron's drive to detoxify the Conservative brand, is worried that his modernising project has stalled and has called for a "more balanced" message that does not stigmatise immigrants or benefit claimants.
The appeal to the Prime Minister comes after he rushed through curbs on EU migrants claiming benefits in Britain before Romanians and Bulgarians get the right to work in the UK on 1 January, and George Osborne signalled a further £12bn of welfare cuts after the 2015 election.
The group warned that ministers' pledges to "clamp down on benefit tourists" would not help the Tories but would make the public think the problem was bigger than it really is. It said squeezing the welfare budget was not changing voters' attitudes and would backfire by building sympathy for the unemployed.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
I think the thing is the benefits fiasco has lost the mouse votes
and not even achieved the aim.
so hes upset both sides.
with regard to paulb at least hes honest in his beliefs, doesnt hide pretending hes not/or is something, or part of something.
Paulb is a champagne socialist
nice guy, all power to his elbow
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Like all champagne socialist ,totally no grasp of the reality of the poor or there working lives
Probably why labour governments are so out of step with the British working class people
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
well like you admitted on another thread so is Farrage
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#249, KeithB, do you actually know PaulB? From your post I suspect not.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
hes a good guy(paul b)
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
post 251
Peter is I very good man ,and theirs absolutely no lick asses on this site
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
you're not doing yourself any favours with a post like 253 keith.
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Say as you see , if only all politicks could be like this instead of the smoke and mirrors from your lot keith S.
If I was a supposed socialist I wouldn't be happy to have a capitalist banker jump to my defence.
But a trait of Champagne socialism is one foot in both camps.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
keith b
I wouldn't want politics to be this way,,,,,
to abuse as you do,,,,
but it appears to be ok for the local Dover UKIP
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
# 248,251,and 252.....agree.
# 249 ....par for the course....do the Dover UKIP members and those showing tenancies
of support UKIP condone K Bibby`s ``unpleasant`` postings ?
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Reg
No more unpleasant than reg and others constantly accusing members on this site of being Nazis ,,Safe in the knowledge that labour party members and supporters can say what they like without getting a ban.
Probably policy's from the top.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
I have to say that the moderators on this site are, if anything to tolerant of some of the rants, and worse, the personal abuse.
but i suppose its all part of the Dover UKIP
SAME OLD UKIP
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
the thread seems to have gone steadily downhill with name calling and thinly veiled accusations, such a pity when the subject matter is so important.