Sacred Mysteries: the Gnostic idea that matter is bad
This comprehensible introduction to the strange beliefs of Gnosticism is delightful...
" What did the Gnostics believe? Someone asked me that, after I mentioned their intellectual opponent, Irenaeus, who lived in Lyon in the second century.
The answer is that we don't quite know, for two reasons. One is that their beliefs varied greatly from group to group. More importantly, they enforced a system of secret teaching, the esoteric gnosis or "knowledge" that gave their sect its name.
Why this should matter centuries later is that, in exposing their beliefs, St Irenaeus (pictured) gave an account of early Christianity that is still freshly impressive. The key teaching of Gnosticism that Irenaeus opposes is that material things are bad. Some Christian writers even now unthinkingly say that our being material is a falling away from God, as if it were equivalent to sin.
Reading Irenaeus's refutation of Gnosticism is no easy task. His treatise Adversus Haereses ("Against the heresies") argues in the manner of the late classical world, which is foreign to our tastes, and he has no section "New readers start here".
So it was a pleasure to catch up with a presentation of Irenaeus's book by the theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar, first published in English in 1990 under the title The Scandal of the Incarnation (Ignatius Press, £9.42). Fortunately, the translator, John Saward, is a theologian in his own right and writes very clearly..."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10356658/Sacred-Mysteries-the-Gnostic-idea-that-matter-is-bad.html Ignorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.