howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
2 January 2011
18:1787320#1,261
always surprises me when staunch reds like keith and john rubbish ukip.
they usually hit in to the blue vote, though i agree with john not so much at the recent county vote.
i think the reality is that if vic and/or ukip stand in priory maxton elms vale that the result will be 3 red district councillors.
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
2 January 2011
18:3687323#1,262
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
2 January 2011
18:3887324#1,263
howard
i hope your correct
vic
if im one of the 2 chaps you mention
i don't have a leader as im not a member of any party
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
2 January 2011
18:5287325#1,264
oh deep joy a bun fight.may is not hear yet and candidates are allready campaigning.
Guest 660- Registered: 14 Mar 2008
- Posts: 3,205
2 January 2011
18:5487326#1,265
No surprises in Tower Hamlets ask me anything you want Vic,and if you need to know about the wards 4 months before an election I would suggest you are running out of time.
I don't speak for my leader but I know he is happy with what I do for the people of my Ward,My Town and My district,wether the people are I will find out in May but I suspect they will be.If not I have tried my best and if that is there will then so be it,I believe in democracy and if I lost I wouldn't change parties to get elected somewhere else.
Howard I suspect you are right and in most of Dover it will not matter where UKIP stand,but it might in some wards,but as I say in Dover I think it will help the Labour Party because disaffected Tories and Libs(who never fight Tower Hamlets) will look to vote elsewhere without voting Labour,I expect those Labour Cllrs to get extra votes than last time.
If you knew what I know,we would both be in trouble!
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
2 January 2011
18:5487327#1,266
I think Vic gave more info than he got, as usual!
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
2 January 2011
18:5887328#1,267
Mr Newsam I have been around a very long time,you only hear what I what to tell.
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
2 January 2011
18:5887329#1,268
A question I asked before but can't remember where to look and don't think it was answered anyway, UKIP stood in Temple Ewell and Lydden (my ward) at the last DDC election and the by-election but nowhere else (and Liberals didn't), why were we so favoured?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
2 January 2011
18:5887330#1,269
ray
like any other poster i answreed his post fully
thats what the forum is all about
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
2 January 2011
19:0087331#1,270
Mr Newsam that was the By-Election for the district it was the only seat going,
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
2 January 2011
19:0387332#1,271
Keith, the
in my post in response to Vic's multitude of smileys showed the spirit of mine
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
2 January 2011
19:0987333#1,272
I was mainly interested why we had a UKIP candidate in the 2007 DDC elections, Arthur George Norton stood for UKIP in Lydden and Temple Ewell and got 79 votes
http://www.dover.gov.uk/pdf/030507DistrictElectionResults.PDFBrian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
2 January 2011
19:2787341#1,273
come on lads give it a rest will you.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
2 January 2011
19:3087344#1,274
brian
this is clearly headed as a political UKIP thread if your not interested like our paulw says don't read it, and don't post
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
2 January 2011
19:3787347#1,275
kieth,the trouble is evan though its a ukip wash bored its creaping into every thread on this board,its starting to get painfull to read.its an absolute turn off your and the others digging at each other like dogs at a bone.so in conclusin keep it to the relevent thread please.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
2 January 2011
19:3987348#1,276
brian
i refer you to post 1269
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
2 January 2011
19:4487349#1,277
kieth,not relevent in any shape or form.if you politicals want to post political posts why dont ask paulb for the relevent space seperate from the main forum,so those who do not want to read the carp dont have to.
Guest 660- Registered: 14 Mar 2008
- Posts: 3,205
2 January 2011
19:4687350#1,278
Brian for someone who doesn't want to read or reply to political posts,you spend a long time reading and replying to them
If you knew what I know,we would both be in trouble!
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
2 January 2011
19:4887351#1,279
brian
i wont post further in reply to you
this is a clear political ukip thread
if you dont want to read it then dont
i clearly mark any postings i start that contain politics with that heading
as i do with football as i know some people dont like footy
with other other posts from other people i just reply
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
2 January 2011
19:5387352#1,280
brian
keith is right on this one, the thread is clearly about politics and many of our members will not even look at it.
say for example someone started a thread entitled "the merits of morris dancing" there is a strong likelihood that i might not look in.
.But thank you so much