Here we go again. All excited about a few hundred sheep crossing to France but not a word about the 3,410 live cattle exported across the Irish Sea from Eire to Great Britain so far in 2017! Is it because they are British sheep?
A couple of years ago when the trade was up for debate at DDC I got permission from the Port of Ramsgate and AHVLA to be present on the dockside during an export movement.
The RSPCA were present and were disgusted by the fact that the protesters were banging on lorry sides and using air-horns which disturbed the sheep who were then left in their lorries on the dock side to calm down.
All transporters were temperature controlled through air-conditioning and all animals had adequate space and water.
Off the record RSPCA did not think there was any cruelty involved in the trade though admitted it was a 'nice little earner', bringing in loads of donations which they could use to prosecute 'real' cases of cruelty.
Indeed when asked by DDC 'WHAT STANDARDS DO YOU BELIEVE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO THE TRANSPORTATION OF LIVE ANIMALS?' their official reply was
The RSPCA had two main concerns with the present transport laws:
1. That the journey times had not kept up with the science and so allowed animals to be transported ad infinitum, providing appropriate rest periods were adhered to.
2. That enforcement was patchy and difficult as the trade could cross over several countries.
Adherence to rest periods, adequate lairages and stocking densities was difficult in many European Union Member States, including the UK. The European Commission’s own report into live transport stated that effective enforcement remained a major challenge. However the Commission had decided not to review or amend Regulation 1/2005 but to focus on improving enforcement, although how it would achieve that remained unclear.
The RSPCA would prefer to see a trade that was limited to a maximum of eight hours transport time, better enforcement, improved facilities at ports and a better emergency procedure should a problem develop.
Improved facilities at ports note, NOT an outright ban.
It is a great shame that due to protests by the usual suspects companies such as P&O refuse to carry the animals on what would be a shorter and more stable crossing.
They do of course still carry such as horses for 'breeding purposes' (to a country where they just happen to eat horse meat.

) so that's all right then.
If you really want to protest about 'cruelty' during animal exports read about Australia here :-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_export But of course that's not half as much fun as a bit of virtue signalling and wasting tax payer's money providing a police presence in Ramsgate, trying to stop you silly buggers throwing yourselves under the lorry wheels, is it?
"We are living in very strange times, and they are likely to get a lot stranger before we bottom out"
Dr. Hunter S Thompson