Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Howard;
now come on geezer barryw/ david and I can agree on other threads
now your disagreeing lol
I do fully understand
all i was pointing out is the 2 main players on this forum were giving there views
which i pointed out.
Of course outside of this there will be many multi national companies consulting/looking in etc
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
keith
you say that you know all what dppt would do, but can you name their investors, who would manage the port, who would staff it and what their plans are for future expansion?
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
Trust Port it is and Trust Port it stays is how I see recent developments.
Audere est facere.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
don 't think so martin for all the talk of community benefits from the department for transport, 400 million used oncers would be too much for the exchequer to turn down in these straitened times.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Howard
I dont defend the peoples port
i have some reservations to
maybe some of the leading lights will reply
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
howard mcsweeney1 wrote:don 't think so martin for all the talk of community benefits from the department for transport, 400 million used oncers would be too much for the exchequer to turn down in these straitened times.
Time will tell Howard
Audere est facere.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Howard, in these days of QE, we could pay with unused oncers. Hold that thought.....
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 1694- Registered: 24 Feb 2016
- Posts: 1,087
post numbers 586, 590, 602 and 607 accurately reflect the current situation with regard to DPPT and the Port of Dover.
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
Mr Wiggins you know yourself that the port will stay as it is,and will be run by the D.H.B. and that is the end of the matter.Your way was never going to happen and for one I am glad it did not.
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
There are more that have the opposite view Vic
Roger.
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
Not that many now and geting less and less each day.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
last post isnt correct
but is a viewpoint
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
Sorry but my post is correct aske around the town support for the plan is moving back towards it staying a Royal Port,and so it should.The History of this great Town must stay in place forever and its port,that plays a great part in that History.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
It has long moved on from that postion
maybe some should recognise it
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
Again you are very wrong the postion of the port ois the same today as it was 400years a go, some will try to say it has but it has not, the DHB is still running the port and that was put in place by the Royal Charter only faces change.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Neil, you may find that Vic's 689 post is right.
The difference between Vic's posts and mine in respect to this, is that I shall prove it through an official letter from the DfT, backed by the Prime Minister.
The only other option would be, that the DfT officially declare that your proposal has been accepted.
Dover and District shall find out very soon, Neil, and it will be most final!
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Neil's 688 is factually accurate as matters stand right now. What happens in the future nobody knows but there may be some surprises in the pipeline.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
There are some surprises in the pipeline, Peter.
The DfT will clarify.
Guest 1694- Registered: 24 Feb 2016
- Posts: 1,087
nothing that you have received from the DfT will come as a surprise to me Alexander, nothing at all.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
this has turned into the most pointless thread i can remember on here, anyone supposedly in the know pretending that they know something that is not worth bothering us mere mortals with.