Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
kieth 3 square centimeters,aprox.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
i don't see the issue as about losing green belt land,more about losing hospital land at a time when we need more because of a steadily rising population.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
so who is still fighting for and are we to get a hospital in dover?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
a dead duck keith not enough photo opportunities left.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
bet it comes up in the election campaigns
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
Now that the birthing unit issue at Buckland has been resolved, a Planning Application is being worked on now that will be with DDC before too long.
An application couldn't be presented before this was resolved, because they didn't know whether to include one or not (a birthing unit); some poeple will say (as they always do) that it was a foregone conclusion, maybe it was, but unless you go out in force and give a show of strength, they'll (the PCT) take the lack of attendance as apathy, so it becomes self-fullfilling.
Roger
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
# 806...``unless you go out in force and give a show of strength the PCT will take the lack of attendence as apathy``
We had a campaign for four years,two demonstrations and a 32,574 signature petition what more do you want?
And unfortunately it was DDC regeneration and planning officers who cocked up in mega style by ignoring the evidence of
the flood plain and advised the Health authorities and PCT and all involved agencies that the Maison Dieu site was
appropriate to build our hospital which delayed the project for two years and resulted in the hospital to be built on the most
inappropriate site in Coombe Valley road.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
does this mean the hospital is a no go then
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
kieth every thing in dover is a no go,when lots of money is involved.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Any campaigners out there still fighting for a hospital? or is it all over?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
I'll repeat my previous posting - obviously it was written in invisible ink.
Now that the birthing unit issue at Buckland has been resolved, a Planning Application is being worked on now that will be with DDC before too long.
An application couldn't be presented before this was resolved, because they didn't know whether to include one or not (a birthing unit); some poeple will say (as they always do) that it was a foregone conclusion, maybe it was, but unless you go out in force and give a show of strength, they'll (the PCT) take the lack of attendance as apathy, so it becomes self-fullfilling.
Roger
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
bitchy roger.
i presume a new application is for a new hospital for dover then
or is that invisible to???
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
What is bitchy about my post Keith ?
Isn't what I've said "bleedin obvious" ?
Roger
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
well you are obviously in the know of a secret planning application which may or may not include a hospital for dover?
i will leave it there
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
another mmmmmmmm yes well,another no comment.
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,894
I thought it was mentioned a lot earlier on this thread that planning application would not be put forward until after Summer which is more or less what Roger is saying. I can not be bothered to plough through the previous 20 pages of waffle
to find it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
seen enough planning applications go in for the snoops site and that derelict site in malvern road to take it all too serously.
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
O.K. no more comment on it - I've said what is happening, if you choose not to believe me, that's your choice.
Is there any point in me posting anything anymore ?
Roger
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Talking of invisible ink,do you want # 807 in braille? Why as a Councillor who is on the planning committee and always, no
matter what evidence is available,defends their regrettable past and present is not defending their debacal performance on
our Hospital ?
The regeneration and planning Officers ignored time after time evidence from the environment agency of the flood plain for
two years and continually,meeting after meeting, mislead the Health Authorities and all other agencies involved that the
problem existed.A` criminal`act and duty in Local Authority planning procedures.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
well we will just have to keep guessing i suppoose
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
