Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
I'm sure the primary risks identified would be opposition from and sabotage by identified vested interests. Hence the reluctance to publish.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
lets hide it all
and not listen to the information geezer
this could have been put to bed a long time ago
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Illegal Kidney trade booms as new organ is `sold every hour`.The World Health Organisation estimates 10.000 organs
now traded each year.
Private Medicine is very commercial....and there is considerable potential profit available.!!
Private Medicine Breast Plant Scenario.?
Risk Register.?
Commodity Traders.??
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Stop the world - Reg wants to get off....
I have absolutely no idea what #783 means. It would be good to get an entire meaningful sentence or phrase out of Reg!!
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
the intellectual musings of reg, tom and the like tend to go over the head of us mere mortals.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
or plebs like me
selling of organs bit worrying
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Mine isn't for sale.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
i'v only got a piano lol
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
# 783......explained......Apologies for the OTT Inuendo.............
One..Human Kidney trade is big business with enormous profits.
Two ..Private Medicine in UK may be interested in this trade due to the large profit margins.
Three...Private Medicine jumped on breast implants due to the profit margins and made a mess of it.
Four....There are very high risks in the kidney transplant trade...ie Risk Register.
Five,,,,Commotity Traders buy up products and wait until the price is at its highest and then make a killing.These traders
would definitely be in the hunt.
No more inuendo`s from me......
Trade in Human organs is illegal in the Uk and EU , The main market is the Peoples Republic of China and Iran , China has made the trade illegal recently but there is no provision for controlling the harvesting of human organs from executed prisoners as they are deemed to be state property
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
well reg
any more to say on this after sarah's post
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Ofcourse it is illegal,but market forces rule,it would be extremely naive to think this trade will not spread illegal or not.
The demand for kidney transplants is high and emotions for loved ones also high and the NHS will not be involved.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
reg;
how does private medicine get away with it?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Bless there I go again , little naive old me , must be all those free sausage rolls setting in again .
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
blimey sarah
i love sausagerolls
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 710- Registered: 28 Feb 2011
- Posts: 6,950
NHS/Localism/selling-off...
"We are constantly told that the government in its localism agenda wants decisions and control to go to the local level. What, then, are we to make of the decision, slipped out by Andrew Lansley in a written statement in January, that NHS properties such as community hospitals, health centres and clinics are to be removed from local control by April 2013, and vested in a new national NHS property services company? This company will manage the NHS estates and sell off those it deems surplus.
Surrey alone will see 73 estates seized in this way, originally either provided by local charities or, since 1947, by the local councils and health service. This land grab leaves our local NHS services exposed to a distant bureaucracy with no democratic control. It has been made clear that a prime consideration will be maximising profit but with no provision for any sale's proceeds to remain in the local area to benefit local services.
If we really had joined-up government, following the return of public health to local councils, these estates would be returned to local control so that integrated health, social and educational services could be developed together. Not since the enclosures acts has there been such a blatant, undemocratic and unaccountable seizure of public and locally controlled assets.
Cllr Ruth Lyon
Elmbridge borough council, Surrey"
From...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/may/31/health-act-privatising-nhsIgnorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
# 797.Well spotted Tom.``38 degrees ``are tracking all the privatisation being brought in,in the hope the public will not
be aware.Please keep your eye on your links just in case ``38 degrees`` misses one.Thanks.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
used to be the school playing fields that the blues sold off now it appears to be hospital land.
i wonder what the criteria will be for "surplus"?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
and how much green land will be left?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS