Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
#1
This belongs on a new thread.
A very lengthy letter of explanations has reached me from the Department for Transport regards the Port of Dover, and local regeneration.
It belongs on a new thread, because everything posted on previous threads has become utterly irrelevant and nothing therein corresponds to one iota of the new reality.
Guest 868- Registered: 25 Jan 2013
- Posts: 490
#2
Why not post it then ?
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
#3
So, Paul?
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#4
that must be a new record, alex posting and paul taking all of 6 minutes to reply.
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
#5
So how are we supposed to comment on it?
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#6
Must be the same letter I got.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#7
i think this is a new parlour game.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
#8
So what letter did Vic get, then?
Mine came as a direct reply to my request sent both to the DfT and the Prime Minister.
It directly answers my questions and explains in detail essential information on the future of the Port and local regeneration.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#9
does anyone know the rules to this game, could be fun?
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#10
So glad you have received a letter but as it is a big secret a bit daft starting a meaningless new thread about it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
#11
Jan. it will take me a while to assess all the implications within the letter's content.
You will here more of it. Be patient!
But now let us here from DPPT too. What does DPPT and Charlie Elphicke have to say on the DPPT position?
Where do they stand? Because I'm going to have to write a few home-truths on this thread.
I'd rather DPPT announce themselves how it is with their position, which seems fair.
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#12
So why not read and understand the thing before posting.???????????
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#13
everyone gets letters from the government except me which quite frankly makes me feel left out. rest assured that at any time in the future they write to me i will let everyone on the forum know.
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#14
rule number 1,you have be nutty as a fruit cake,
rule nuber 2,you have to be a member of ukip,
rule 3.you have to have a degree in gobblady geek.
Guest 868- Registered: 25 Jan 2013
- Posts: 490
#15
Certainly comes in at Number 2 in the pointless threads chart, closely behind Vic saying he has nothing to say
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
#16
This has nothing to do with UKIP.
I've always played open cards on the Port issue, the letter came today, and contrary to Vic, who says he has had also a reply from the DfT, I haven't hidden my letter in a cloud of secrecy.
It is time for Charlie Elphicke to tell the Public the truth, else I shall do it for him!
He is the local MP, a founder member of the Dover People's Port Trust (DPPT), and owes the Constituency a statement!
Guest 868- Registered: 25 Jan 2013
- Posts: 490
#17
Alexander D wrote:This has nothing to do with UKIP.
I've always played open cards on the Port issue, the letter came today, and contrary to Vic, who says he has had also a reply from the DfT, I haven't hidden my letter in a cloud of secrecy.
Erm... ?
Guest 671- Registered: 4 May 2008
- Posts: 2,095
#18
Alex.
This is your thread and you have said nothing, except.
It belongs on a new thread, because everything posted on previous threads has become utterly irrelevant and nothing therein corresponds to one iota of the new reality.
So why should,'DPPT and Charlie Elphicke have to say on the DPPT position?'
What position?
"My New Year's Resolution, is to try and emulate Marek's level of chilled out, thoughtfulness and humour towards other forumites and not lose my decorum"
Guest 868- Registered: 25 Jan 2013
- Posts: 490
#19
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
#20
