Cgi plans for the heights
- Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
21 December 2012 19:34206933never mind howard,it kept them fit.
- 21 December 2012 19:44206940Great Glass Elevators come up every time a consultant sees the Shaft !!
There is a parallel shaft not far away that could be utilisedBeen nice knowing you :) - Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
22 December 2012 07:57206974paul scotchie
yes thanks got it, not had time to view at mo realy busy
but i will when things quiten down a bit
after xmas probably who would you like me to send it on to???
any takers?ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
22 December 2012 07:58206975woops and paul scotchie thankyou lolALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 18 March 2013 18:16220898Do we know whether they have come out in support of "Constructive Conservation" on the Western Heights, Paul ?
Roger - 19 March 2013 05:36220927Thanks Paul - then in that case it's double standards. They need to put their money where their (collective) mouths are.
Roger - 19 March 2013 11:20221049Brave decisions are needed to move (Dover - and the Heights) forward.
Roger - 19 March 2013 23:44221128Roger, we have a petition to defend the Heights and Farthingloe, and there was a Public Consultation recently on the core strategy, a few months back, in which I took part, and for which DDC sent me a reply to acknowledge it is being taken into account.
Hopefully all these building plans will be rejected and the core strategy will start from new.Chanters, Drums and Drones Potty Time http://youtu.be/99fMqpjnXYA
Rule Britannia!
Kent First http://youtu.be/04F3mAP3fV4 Keep banging on http://youtu.be/qYCU_SKmkGQ - 20 March 2013 06:58221133No chance Alexander - the future (of Dover and the Heights) is too important to be allowed to just disintegrate as your petition would do.
Dover MUST move forward.
Roger - Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
20 March 2013 07:34221134roger,you are right there,dover dose need to move forward.but some people cant understand that. - 14 April 2013 17:28225255rears its head again, whatever you do don't tell alex.
http://planning.dover.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=DCAPR_219616 - 14 April 2013 18:46225259I promise Howard.
Roger - Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
14 April 2013 19:53225267me to,i wont tell him if you dont. - 14 April 2013 20:02225270alex has been on earlier but failed to spot this due to our vigilance brian.
- Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
14 April 2013 20:18225271 - 16 April 2013 10:46225516The rural lobby and sustainable housebuilding in the countryside
"Peter Hetherington states that "A vocal lobby, from the chairman of the National Trust to the Campaign to Protect Rural England, is seemingly against any development, presumably preferring soulless villages, set in aspic and largely devoid of life" (Who will lead the renaissance for rural communities?, 9 April 2013). This is patently untrue. A recent review of CPRE's housing policies, led by our dedicated grassroots organisation, resulted in a statement (available on our website) that said: "Meeting the housing needs of rural communities is particularly important if they are to thrive."
And this statement is backed by action. Our Leicestershire branch part-funds a rural housing enabler, whose job it is to get rural affordable housing built to meet needs in our villages and market towns. And a few years ago our Suffolk branch, in partnership with local councils and Orwell Housing Association, led a pioneering design competition for new affordable housing in the village of Elmswell. The result was 26 energy-efficient new affordable homes.
It is true that CPRE opposes unsustainable housing development which would unnecessarily damage our countryside. But we understand that to avoid this very damage, we must support alternatives which offer a sustainable and long-term solution to our housing crisis.
Kate Houghton
Planning officer, CPRE"
For the embedded links to be live and for other letters from:Barney White-Spunner Countryside Alliance and Catherine Harrington National CLT Network...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/apr/15/rural-lobby-housebuilding-countrysideIgnorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing. - 7 June 2013 17:46232593this should satisfy most people with the money set aside for heritage protection.
http://www.dover-express.co.uk/Western-heights-plans-set-approved/story-19217294-detail/story.html - 7 June 2013 17:57232599It is not before time, it is the best way forward if not the only way hope it is all done and I am still about to see it.if and I say if it does go ahead still along way to go yet.
- 7 June 2013 18:39232602.."It is true that CPRE opposes unsustainable housing development which would unnecessarily damage our countryside."
LOL.
Only the CPRE could come out with junk statements like that.
Actually that's not strictly true. There are loads of quangos who spout out nonsense like that every day. - Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
7 June 2013 19:12232605and they have a cheek to get payed for it.