howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
8 November 2010
14:1979102barry
charlie should be doing the wriggling, he should say clearly that he is against the development but there is no chance of stopping it.
8 November 2010
14:2179103Keith.
'very long answer on my views on grammar schools.
and the labour parties stand on it.'
Personally I am in favour of Grammar Schools AND my children have gone to them.
I wonder how others (including our previous MP) cope with the dichotomy?
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
8 November 2010
14:3579107Keith
I have not misquoted you at all, you did not, when I challenged you, provide a quote at all.
I do not know when you gave a 'very long answer to grammar schools' but it was not then.
I am puzzled why you would have to give a 'very long answer'
Why could you just say simply - 'yes I support Dover's grammar schools' or 'no I dont support Dover's grammar schools'. Sury a SHORT answer like that would be all that is required. You have, perhaps proved my point about political double speak when you referred to your long answer.
Howard - there you go again, trying to justify your misinterpretation by saying he should have said this or that. He said what he said, full stop, it was perfectly clear.
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
8 November 2010
14:3779108Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
8 November 2010
14:3879109Just been annouced on bbc south that charlies proposal was unrealistic, and far harsher words.
When charlie was questoned about the share cost was more likely to be
£5,ooo than £10 to buy out all the port
charle agreed and added yes people can, like buying a house take out a mortgage?????????
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
8 November 2010
14:3879110I really do not know what the hell you are rabbiting about Vic. I am having a very good day thank you, very good indeed.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
8 November 2010
14:4179111Barryw
yep you mis quoted me
and it did require a ,long reply to give my reasons why
so please get it right if you wish to state my opinons
thankyou
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
8 November 2010
14:4379112I did not hear what you heard Keith.
Is it the Port you are talking about?
If so I suspect you have got rather confused and did not understand what was being said.
The Trust would indeed be taking out a loan 'like a mortgage' to buy the Port. No doubt a comment in respect of some twerp trying to suggest that the public share issue would be used to buy the Port. That has never been the case.
I wont go into further explanation on this - it has been done to death on another thread.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
8 November 2010
14:4579114Keith - do you know what a quote is? please find out.
To say yes or no to Grammars does not take a long answer unless you are trying to fog the issue.
So then Keith - do you support keeping our grammars? - its takes only a yes or no answer....
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
8 November 2010
15:0279115As stated I gave a long reply on grammar schools
and it would take a longer answer than yes or no
Shame instead of ridiculing all I say nstead read what I say
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
8 November 2010
15:0879117Keith, was hoping that you would have come back with a reasoned argument.
Presumably our ex-MP used the grammar school system since he was outside the catchment area for Brompton Oratory?
Do you spell 'hippocracy' with one or two 'p's.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
8 November 2010
15:1479118bob
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
8 November 2010
15:1979120Keith, my apologies. Have removed a line on my post. I hoped that my comment might be subtle but obviously not. Mea culpa.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
8 November 2010
16:1679127Keith - of course its a 'yes' or 'no' - simple
Thank Bob - well said (not having seen the line you removed!!)
You just prove the point I made Keith.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
8 November 2010
16:2979133Nice one, Bob. Presumably a hippocracy is a system of government where the horses are in charge? Or asses, perhaps. The rest of you, stop being nasty to each other or I shall report you all to Teacher.
PG.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
8 November 2010
16:3279134Peter, blaaaaaaagh, of to bed, se other thred...................
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
8 November 2010
16:4079136Thnk iv answered this enough now
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
8 November 2010
16:4479137To sleep, perchance to dream....... (But at least I wont be wrestling with my conscience?)
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
8 November 2010
16:4579138Avoiding an answer then Keith.....yet again
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
8 November 2010
16:4679139have as already stated a thousand times answered that
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
