Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
6 November 2010
23:5878862#1
Yes Folks,this is happing at Whitfield.
The press officer for UKIP AT Dover send a email to our MP about the Whitfield Development and how does he stand about it ,and the D,D,C.
He emailed back to us ,saying"I stand along side of the Public of Whitfield and agree that the development should NOT GO AHEAD.
He goes on to say ,"That the DDC, is in wrong in agreeing that it should go ahead.I have send this EMAIL to Paul of the Dover forum asking him to print it out for all to see.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
7 November 2010
00:2578866#2
Well done, Vic!
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
7 November 2010
00:2778867#3
Unlike some political parties, in the Blues there is no centrally dictated line which has to be followed - or else.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
7 November 2010
01:0578868#4
Mr Garstin sorry but you are wrong there.
Guest 640- Registered: 21 Apr 2007
- Posts: 7,819
7 November 2010
08:2278871#5
Vic yes many thanks...will use that..watch for it coming up on frontpage from tomorrow.
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
7 November 2010
08:2678872#6
No he's not Vic. he is dead right. Spot on.
It's not healthy that local town councils and councillors (District too) are told how to vote by the central (National) party.
Roger
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
7 November 2010
08:2978873#7
Quite right Peter and Roger - The Conservatives are not a centrally controlled organisation in which members and its elected representatives are told what to think and do. It is the Party of the individual.
It is quite reasonable and legitimate for the Conservative MP and a Conservative Council to take opposing views on an issue.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
7 November 2010
08:5578874#8
Vic
It's good that you hghlght ths, of course this is not the labour party and so its all ok for the MP/councl to be campaiging against each other.
but thanks Vc for hghlighting it
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
7 November 2010
09:4778882#9
THANK you all for your support again on this one as I said,the blues are on the run ,and the winning post for them in the next locals is avery long way away,all the outsides are in a good postion to win and awin for them is a win for Dover and the District,lets get rid of the old school tie lot ,and get some real new faces there.
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
7 November 2010
10:2078891#10
Mr Matcham, I'll keep it simple, you do write the most ridiculous rubbish.
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
7 November 2010
10:2878894#11
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
7 November 2010
10:3278895#12
the fact remains that charlie is playing populist politics here.
the whitfield development is a done deal, just the nitty griity to be resolved.
Sue Nicholas- Location: river
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 6,025
7 November 2010
10:3378896#13
Correct Howard .
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
7 November 2010
10:3978899#14
Howard ,you might be right, but in the end they just might run out of funding to do it fully time will tell.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
7 November 2010
10:4678902#15
i am not saying that all the houses will be built vic, the economic climate confirms this.
what i object to is when politicians try to grab cheap publicity by saying that they can stop something that is already rubber stamped.
Sue Nicholas- Location: river
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 6,025
7 November 2010
10:5078903#16
Vic not so much of the old school tie .You are living in the past .Howard you speak a lot of sense.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
7 November 2010
10:5378904#17
What funding Vic? The Council is not funding the building it is only setting the planning parameters and it will be up to the market and the private sector to build as market conditions allow over the next 30 years or so.
You really do run off at odd tangents.
Ross Miller
- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 17 Sep 2008
- Posts: 3,709
7 November 2010
11:2378907#18
Beat me to it Barry
I am also sure that social infrastructure needs will be covered in part by Section 106 conditions
"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today." - James Dean
"Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength,
While loving someone deeply gives you courage" - Laozi
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
7 November 2010
11:3878911#19
I thought the local elections were not until next year, this thread strikes as election waffle about a subject already past boredom point on the other thread.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 690- Registered: 10 Oct 2009
- Posts: 4,150
7 November 2010
11:4478912#20
I do actually read most of these politics threads and postings, but must confess that some of it is just the same thing but worded different on a new thread. I`ll go along with Jan on her posting.
Tell them that I came, and no one answered.
