Never give up the fight.
- 12 June 2011 13:03109982I do not support any developement.
- Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
12 June 2011 13:04109983even if the developer gave dosh to parish council?ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 12 June 2011 13:08109984No,because the public of Whitfield have said time and time again they do not want the Developement.All said if it does happen then any funding must go to the parish not D.D.C.
- 12 June 2011 13:15109985there seems to be some concern about how whitfield will look after all the new houses are built.
i looked up the most recently completed project by the developers and this should put all your minds at rest.
- 12 June 2011 13:53109987For Gawds sake don't indulge him it's all *ollocks .
Bern is bang on , this thread will only spiral downwards to ''I know something you don't''
Mr Matcham lost all credibility after the Status Quo affair. He has a continuing 'love affair' with the camera and getting cheap publicity in the local rag. Why other would he continue to stand in unopposed elections for multi parishes that have differing view points.
Howard could you please allocate him one thread where he can spout forth his rubbish without destroying the intelligent discussions that take place on other threads.Marek
I think therefore I am (not a Tory supporter) - 12 June 2011 13:53109988Nothing to worry about there then, Howard, as long as the money goes to the Parish Council..........
- 12 June 2011 13:54109989Ha! We crossed threads Marek! The idea of a Vic Thread is good - I will defend to the death his right to speak his mind, but not necessarily on every thread!!!!!
- 12 June 2011 14:02109990Bern
Marek
I think therefore I am (not a Tory supporter) - 12 June 2011 15:17109994Marek,I would just like to say this was my thread,you did not have to take part in it,but I am glad you did even if you do not agree with what I say,time will tell if I am right or wrong.
- 12 June 2011 16:21110007You're wrong, see #50 for why.
- 12 June 2011 16:53110014I apologise to Vic - this is indeed his thread. My irritation with his certainty of his own rightness got the better of me - and actually, I wouldn't want him to change! Vics charm is made up of his verve and righteousness.
- 12 June 2011 16:58110015Howard's post 64 explains why we should say no!
If the 6,000 houses go ahead, that could mean about 30,000 more residents.
If these have children, and Dover's population also have children, then the next generation will need two new building areas and not one!
So in 27 years time, it would be 12,000 houses.
In the meantime, who knows how many people could have emigrated to Britain. So it could actually be 24,000 houses in 27 years time.
Then comes the third generation, and in 37 years time, how many houses then?
It pays off to look ahead and do some arithmetics!Chanters, Drums and Drones Potty Time http://youtu.be/99fMqpjnXYA
Rule Britannia!
Kent First http://youtu.be/04F3mAP3fV4 Keep banging on http://youtu.be/qYCU_SKmkGQ - Alec Sheldon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 18 Aug 2008
- Posts: 1,037
12 June 2011 17:05110017I went to most of the Whitfield Action Group meetings (WAG) and the majority were against it. Very few for it. So democracy won, I don't think so. - 12 June 2011 17:08110020Thank you Mr Sheldon on your support and the feeling are just the same today that is why we must not give up in trying to stop it.
- Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
13 June 2011 08:28110066VIC;
I think the time for opposition has passed, that was when all the public participation took place.
I'm very interested in SUE'S reply to my comments on the working group, realise shes busy at mo, but hope a reply comes back soon, may answer some of the questions.ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 13 June 2011 08:45110067Keith, I have nothing new to add what I have already said,I hope to get to the parish meeting and I might know more then.But the opposition is still there.
- 13 June 2011 08:46110068Keith my understanding is that full consultation has taken place there were hundreds of responses .Members of the LDF group were concerned that infractructre is in place before too many dwellings are built .The school being one of them .
Bryan Curtis still sits on that group.Our Barry Williams ,Roger Knight to name a few .
The group is not just councillors .Members of Whitfield Parish Council went along and spoke at the Scrutiny meeting .
I think every thing is very open . - Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
13 June 2011 08:59110072SUE;
You have not replied to my questions, and that just gives fuel to our vic.
interesting names sitting on this group, do wonder why some of those names on there, but thats another storyALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 13 June 2011 09:15110078I don't think anyone should post any more on this thread until they can swear on oath that they have read every document on this page!
http://www.dover.gov.uk/regeneration_delivery/supplementary_planning_documen/whitfield_masterplan_spd.aspx
And this one for good measure!
http://www.dover.gov.uk/regeneration_delivery/supplementary_planning_documen/whitfield_masterplan_spd/whitfield_spd_evidence_bas.aspx - Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
13 June 2011 09:33110081ray]
rea it
interested tyo know whitfield action groups latest viewsALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
