Never give up the fight.
- 9 June 2011 08:57109437Well I always say never give up in fighting for what you think is right.
What am I on about now?.
Well it is the controversial plans for the Whitfield development.
Over the last two years I have been saying keep the fight going do not give up on this development not happing.
As you all know most of the public that live at Whitfield do not want this development in any forum to go ahead, and as just one of the parish cllr on the Whitfield I am right behind them in trying to stop it going ahead.
As you see in the local papers last week the first phase were withdrawn from the Dover District Council,s planning meeting.
This does not mean it will still not go ahead but a hold up is a hold up and gives more time to try and stop it from going ahead,the more holdups there is, adds to the cost to the development to both the district council and the developer of the site.
In the end the development might just be put hold long term, so we must keep up the fight and look for all the loop-holes in the development to keep Whitfield as it is today a very nice place to live and still keeps it own identity as a parish. - Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
9 June 2011 09:35109441VIC;
I applaud your committment to a cause, but do find from time to time your not always carrying the people with you.
Let me give you two examples;
1; At the town hall peoples port meeting , your outburst at the end of the meeting
was both disrespectful, but clearly not what that audience wanted to hear
and could have been done elswhere, you put a fair questuion forward at the
start of the meeting as did others many remained unanswered which would
have helped your case, but your outburst at the end didn't gain you many
friends from the people you state you fight for.
Clearly as i said outside, this was a bad move, and put you in a bad light for
many reasons, including.
A;Disrepecting the Mayor
B;Vote loser
C;Wrong audience
2; The second campaign is the latest you report on the Whitfield developement
in the local elections had local opinion in whitfield been against the
developement then the tories would not have gained the 2 seats from the
lib dems.
Clearly it wasn't even a close call, people in whitfield were happy to elect
2 tories happy in there leaflet to have the developement in whitfield.
So vic you do need i feel tio reflect on the campaigns to be involved in
and look at, is this about just getting publicity for vic, or am i on the same
wavelengnth as the local people.
I hope this advice can be taken as just that, advice to a friend, we can all learn from each other.
I have strong views on both of thse campaigns, but feel it better to put the arguments forward, trying in the process to take people with you.
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 9 June 2011 09:37109443keith is right on the whitfield issue, the surprise victory for the blues has to be seen as meaning that the people are largely in favour of the development with certain reservations.
- Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
9 June 2011 09:40109445HOWARD;
I hoped i wasright on both, not just the whitfield oneALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 9 June 2011 09:45109446Wrong Keith,the lib/Dems only lost out at Whitfield because of their standing with the public within the UK,but they had avery good District Cllr at Whitfield and I for one was sorry to see him not get in again,as for the public of the parish they still do not want the development but they did think they had lost the fight,so were trying to get as much back from it as they could for the parish.
- Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
9 June 2011 09:55109450VIC;
I totaly disagree with your comment, if the locals of whitfield didnt want the developement, then they would have sent a clear message to the tories locally and at westminster.
Clive was a very popular cllr, and this one issue was one would have got people passionate enouigh to vote lib dem.
Whilst the national scene would have hadan effect, this campaign iun a very small area should have been enough to get at least Clive back into council.
We need to be honest here, the result wasnt even close,ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 9 June 2011 10:02109453I am always honest Keith,time will tell which one of us is right.
- 9 June 2011 10:28109461Keep it up, Vic
Keith, you are totally out of range with the above mentioned explanations. The Town-hall meeting to present (duscuss?!) the parish pole has absolutely nought to do with the Whitfield building plans.
Last year I received an email from someone in Whitfield informing me that many people there simply hope the economic situation in Britain will be so bad, that DDC simply drop at least most of the plans to build up the area there.
As we all know, DDC made no public consultaion in the sense: "do you want the urbanisation plans, yes, or no?"
...but rather did it this way: "the plans will go ahead whether you like it or not, to the last brick, and not one less, but just say whether you want a a thump in the left eye or in the right eye".
Such public consultation has nothing to do with democracy, and as Paul W said clearly before the publ;ic consultation period in November last year was over: "there is nothing you can do about it".
Further more, Vic is Councillor in Whitfield, and is doing his duty there.Chanters, Drums and Drones Potty Time http://youtu.be/99fMqpjnXYA
Rule Britannia!
Kent First http://youtu.be/04F3mAP3fV4 Keep banging on http://youtu.be/qYCU_SKmkGQ - 9 June 2011 10:37109464Thank you for your support on this ,well Keith what do you have to say about that?
- 9 June 2011 10:44109465Alexander, you have put quotation marks around something that DDC obviously didn't say, and there was significant public consultation. The outline proposals were a set of documentation that sat about two feet high and were sent to all parish councils that were adjacent and likely to be affected, not just Whitfield.
As far as I am aware Whitfield parish council have accepted that the development will go ahead and are working to get the best out of it for the village. Lydden parish council have voted to support Whitfield parish council in their views, so as Vic is a member of both (once he eventually deserts a River parish council meeting to sign on at Lydden
) then he's going to be at loggerheads with both councils. - 9 June 2011 12:22109471I am not going to any meetings yet,Mr Newsam but I will get there soon.
As for Whitfield accepting it and agreeing with it is not the same,when this was done,we did not have the holdup like we have now so as I see it, still all to play for. - 9 June 2011 12:51109475I am wondering if it is likely that this proposed development will mean more traffic using the already abused Alkham Valley Road? Has this been considered?
Moreover, is Dover so buoyant economy-wise as to need 700 more homes? - 9 June 2011 13:06109479You are right Mrs Woodridge at this time housing is not selling, still good sites within the town for building good homes if the need be.
- 9 June 2011 13:09109482it is all about gaining "growth point" status, i am not au fait with the details but basically if a local authority agrees to house building on their manor the government will give said local authority a wheel barrow load of untraceable bank notes for spending locally.
- Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
9 June 2011 14:28109502ALEXANDER/VIC
I stand by what I say, although paulw may have not done so well at the public meeting in whitfield, and was jeered at that time, since then a number of meetings have taken place with all manor of people living in and around whitfield, including fierce opponents of any build, who have since come round to agreeing to some build.
As i say this issue if it was so big would have seen the 2 conservative candidates get a very low vote which they did not, they took out a very active lib dem.
I do feel now the situation has changed since those early days, and whitfield has given the conservatives a clear mandate to push ahead with the developement.ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 9 June 2011 15:14109515That is not true Keith.
- Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
9 June 2011 15:17109517VIC;
It would be nice to know vic, from where you base your thoughts ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 9 June 2011 15:18109520That will come after my next parish council meeting Keith.
- Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
9 June 2011 15:23109522VIC;
No idea what post 18 is about.
I recall you saying to me you were going to attend a parish meeting and try to convince them to go for a referendum, where i said to you, what about if they don't, you said well you will then push for a referendum against there wishes.
strange
is that correct?ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS - 9 June 2011 17:23109534Again Keith that is not true,I do not know where you are coming from on that one.