Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Deputy Govenor of Bank of England Paul Tucker `Shops` Osborne.
Osbornes outrageous use of short term /provocative propaganda comes unstuck yet again.
Paul Tucker repeated for the select committee ``substitutes``that Labour ministers and Ed Balls
did not get involved with `Libor` rates.
There is a general call for him to make a public apology.Osborne is not the type of person
who can apologies it is `beneath` him.Could be a case of Narcistic Personality Disorder.
# 94.thanks for response,can we take that as an opinion or as a `spokesperson`?
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Neither. It is fact. Commercial banks do retail and small corporate lending. Investment banks are primarily intermediaries in much larger transactions and are mostly involved in equity deals, not debt.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Nicely side stepped.....the proposal is for a Bank to invest in small businesses....the `i` must be small......
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Funny Reg how you pick what to you seem to be tiny holes in what people say but never respond to the massive gulfs picked in what you say.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
so having had your very own conservative select committee chair saying osbourne should apologise and was wrong
doesn't that say it all?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
No one really has pinned down what he said that requires an apology. That pond-life Balls hysteria over the fact that he has questions to answer is no reason. What is he so worried about is the big question that needs to be answered?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
so barryw your conservative select committee chair is lieing and wrong?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
The chairman, if he/she said that is wrong.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
well well barryw
says it all does it not
glad at least some of your chums recognise the issue
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
You do not seem to recognise it yourself Keith as you have not really said why an apology should be made for saying the responsible Minister at the time has questions to answer given the allegations made about pressure placed on Barclays (not the red herring, the Bank of England) by people close to Brown.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
exactly as your chum on the select committee stated barryw
and your fully aware
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Clearly you do not know or you would have said.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
the opposite to what you imply
why is it your chum on the select committee understands it and you wsh not to?
or is this another of your point scoring exercises or red herrings to try to take heat off no friends, george?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Keith - look...
I have said he should not apologise.
I reproduced on the forum the relevant paragraphs of the 'offending' article
I have demonstrated the red herring that was the evidence of Tucker by reference to that article
I have given reasons why Balls has questions to answer
What have you produced to counter these points - nothing at all, zilch
I have no idea why that person said what he or she said, perhaps it is just one of these weak kneed people who dislikes straight talking.
Given what I have produced it is up to you to justify what you say and counter the points I made one by one backed up with evidence of your own. Can you add substance to what you are saying, no. It is up to you to make a case, you have not made one.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
His agent apologized on his behalf ......because his personality disorder would not permit
him to do the decent thing himself.
You must be the only person in the UK defending this misfit......
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
reg
i wasn't aware his agent had the guts to admit george was wrong
thank you for that
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Not sure if he had the guts .........but sure as Osborne`s agent he would only do it with
Osborne`s approval.....otherwise he will be looking for another job....
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
yes reg thinking it through of course your right
but makes osbourne look silly
and just political point scoring
sad on such a serious item
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Once again no-one actually pinpoints what should be apologised about. Nothing tangible has been said at all.
I am absolutely certain that if the roles were reversed and Balls said this about Osborne the Labour supporting mafia above would be saying the opposite. At least I do not blindly support Osborne and I, myself, have criticised him when needed but in this case about the totally odious Balls he is right.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
barry
would you like someone to say in public that you had questions to be asked about without anything else added?