Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
OK, Keith, here goes:
They came for the fourth and fifth child. I said nothing.
Then they came for the chronically unemployed. I remained silent.
Then they came for the poorer pensioners, and I persisted in saying nothing.
After which, they came for the third child...and I knew it was my turn.
I cried, but no-one would hear me, they all said nothing.
Many had been taken away and so could not speak.
Only then did I realise how I had signed my own death warrant when I remained silent.
Keith, if ever the British State dared to leave children in our Country to die owing to their being too many, I will certainly stand up and speak out for them, were it to cost me my life!
Guest 687- Registered: 2 Jun 2009
- Posts: 513
Latest news, the lady with 11 children owns a horse and wants to buy 2 more. Alexander this is why we must limit not throw more money at this woman. I recently was in the process of buying a horse for Karen and realised I could not JUSTIFY the expense when I have children and grandchildren who still need my financial help(education etc), perhaps I should start breeding again then Karen could have her horse and perhaps one for the grandchildren.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Oh dear, Godwin's Law rears its ugly head again in the form of Pastor Niemoller. Alex, telling parents that any future children over and above 3 won't mean increased state handouts is hardly to be compared with dragging excess offspring away in the middle of the night and putting them in death camps.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
So lets get this right, Keith is advocating cutting child benefits.
Theres hope for the world if finally even monkey in a rosette lefties are beginning to see the light.
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,894
I also saw that Ken, that woman is obviously doing very nicely on her benefits as it can cost about £200 a month just to look after the horse properly.
The following link was the first to come up on google but is not the complete article as you have to pay to read it.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article3693035.ece-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
Sometimes I despair of Alexander's thought processes and conclusions.
Alexander - People must take responsibility for their own actions, including proceation, not just think "Oh, that's O.K. the State will pay for all my kids" (etc.)
Roger
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
ken
she may just be acting in a prudent manner, think of the savings on food being made.
Guest 710- Registered: 28 Feb 2011
- Posts: 6,950
It would be difficult to argue with your final point in #66 Roger, but are not your efforts akin to seeding dung with vitamin tablets?
Too little way too late.
You seem to be saying that people should learn, but you propose punishment rather than education as your teaching tool.
Ignorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.
Guest 641- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 2,335
If the latest news re keeping the horse is true, understandable, hunters are so expensive to keep nowadays. Also as she sounds a 'game' girl, maybe we could look into subsidizing her for a few Purdeys
Bang On!
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,894
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
David
you have just shown that you dont read my posts
i have always said we have a serious problem with benefits and the cost
iv also said that ok have as many kids as you like but dont expect others to pay
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
New World Order?
Will children in Britain be abandoned and left to go hungry?
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
The Constitution would make any such New World Order moves, which are the fruit of reckless economic management and financial collapse, impossible.
"...the rights of British citizens to live with dignity and be able to participate in the economy, to be assisted in time of need..."
So children will not be left to starve in Britain.
As posted previously, I will stand up and speak out for children if the State tries to take away their right to live.
Otherwise I'd have to renege myself!
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
we could allways do what china did,and limit 1 child per famly.but hey thats against our human rights in it.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Alex, calm down dear. There's no need to fret about children being left to starve by the State (although neglect by their own parents is definitely an issue). Your position on the issue is made less credible by your accusing the Government of plotting to eliminate children and by implying that anyone calling for a reduction in the number of children paid for by the state is an extremist Nazi.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Haven't written this at all, Peter.
I haven't accused the State of plotting to do these things, but was commenting on the posts that appeared here, and said: IF the State...
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
too be brutally honest alex i cannot see the state taking away the rights of children to live, nick clegg would veto it.
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
Do you think it would be suggested by the Nasty Party then Howard ?
Roger
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Who is the `nasty party` ?
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
Labour.
Roger
