Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
Well come on then I've asked you 2 questions.............
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Will we recognise it9doubtful0
what would labour do, i have no idea
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
The NHS will be nothing like what people want it to be
As im no longer part of labour i wouldnt know what they would do cant say much more than that
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
Keith Sansum1 wrote:The NHS will be nothing like what people want it to be
As im no longer part of labour i wouldnt know what they would do cant say much more than that
What exactly does that mean though Keith, its not a prediction just banal old cliches
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
I have answered all these questions before David
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
andy burnham would have made even more cuts than the blues if the reds had been re-elected, he put that on public record.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
quite like that guy
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
800 fewer nurses as NHS refunds £2.2bn to Treasury
There is an unhappy juxtaposition of figures swirling around at the moment.
The first is that the Department of Health is expected to underspent against its 2012-13 expenditure limit by £2.2bn, and none
of that is to be carried over for future use. It will instead go back to the Treasury.
The second figure is in the NHS workforce survey which shows that last month the NHS lost 800 more nurses.
When the head of the NHS, Sir David Nicholson, announced the need for £20bn savings over a four year period it was promised
that these savings would be reinvested on issues such as integrating services and longer term efficiencies.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
We need a national health service to be proud of
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
nhs who kieth,havent the torys sold all off now.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
will soon be a long wait to get one's jeremy kyles sorted brian.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
I'm sure google can find you a private proctologist, Howard.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
sure jeremy will sort it lol
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Hunt U-turn: more nurses are needed in the NHS
The NHS may have to recruit hundreds of extra nurses to improve standards of care in hospitals
, the Health Secretary conceded today.
Jeremy Hunt said a review of appropriate staffing levels by a new Chief
Inspector of Hospitals would almost certainly result in an increase in the number of nurses on hospital wards. "I wouldn't be
surprised if many more nurses are employed," Mr Hunt said.
Until now health chiefs have said that the reduction in nursing numbers was not
affecting patient care.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mr Hunt refused to say if cutbacks in nursing staff and a dependence on unregulated healthcare
assistants had contributed to a decline in standards of care.
The Health Secretary was delivering the Government's response to the Francis Inquiry.
Wonder what number this item was on the `Risk Register`?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Now we see lib dems(part of the cobbled together govt} in eastbourne calling for the resignation of the chief exec of the local hospital.
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
RCGP Chair calls "for ministers to revoke S75 NHS regs while they undergo proper
legal scrutiny& clarity is obtained as to Gov's intentions"
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
BMA have other concerns to
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Hunt drops clause that puts NHS patients first.......once again tories talk the talk
but fail to act....
Jeremy Hunt has defied the central recommendation of the Mid Staffordshire inquiry
, that the rights of patients be formally enshrined at the heart of the NHS.
The redrafted constitution states that the health service will only 'aspire' to put patients first.
Robert Francis, the inquiry chairman, said that one of his top priorities was for the NHS
constitution to be rewritten, making it explicit that "patients are put first" and "everything
done by the NHS should be informed by this ethos".
He recommended that the Health Secretary also consider stipulating that NHS staff
"put patients before themselves".
But the redrafted constitution, quietly released last week, simply states that the
health service will only "aspire" to put patients first.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
oh dear i hope that is just a poor choice of words and not the way things will be in future. i expect doctors to do more than aspire to treat people.
