Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
i love that word "falsehood", sounds like it would sit well with an old testament prophet.
i am picturing neil landing on the western heights in a chariot of fire and giving his enemies an almighty smiting.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Eastern Docks more likely Howard....
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
I'm in the process of making my representation on the proposed development, Howard.
I'll send it to DDC Planning as indicated on the Planning Site Notice, with the due reference code.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Alex you can do it online,
http://planning.dover.gov.uk/online-applications/registrationWizard.do?action=start, register here first, it's much easier and if you do it online they can't ignore/edit/abridge your submission.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Thanks, Peter. But I'll send it as stated on the Planning Site Notice.
What would abridge mean, in this case?
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Shorten, in order to 'clarify' the meaning. Long, rambling letters of objection received from the public are I believe sometimes abridged by council staff to make them easier for councillors to base their decisions on. Submit online and your viewpoint is immediately a matter of public record.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Oh! Well thanks for that, Peter!
I'll look into this, and examine the link sometime tonight.
Would be nice to see my representation on public record. Does that mean it will be visible to the public?
I might as well edit my article on Western Heights, if it helps Paul make his decision. I'll remove the reference to WHPS, but NOT the reference to the Sun rising over Dover Castle to the East and setting on Western Heights.
That is my perspective of events, as I see them on a daily basis!
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
Alexander, you need to drag yourself into the 21st century, while you have been posting on here 53 people have already put their objections on public record.
http://planning.dover.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=neighbourComments&keyVal=DCAPR_219616Guest 651- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 5,673
Why should changing your article help me make my decision????? I am not the one making incorrect statements with absolutely no basis or evidence behind it !!!
Been nice knowing you :)
Guest 651- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 5,673
14 comments Ray, 39 are Consultee Comments that are awaiting a response.
Been nice knowing you :)
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Are these comments representations, Ray?
The number 53 appeared, but only 9 comments were there, plus about four that were unavailable.
Confusing, this!
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
I know it was 14 but I thought 53 would give Alexander a bit more of a surprise
Alexander, read the link that Peter has put above and the one I put on an earlier page, all will be explained.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Nope, Ray!
The links are identical. It says 53 comments, but only nine are there, plus about 5 purported comments which, however, are classed as unavailable.
The same question is asked: are these comments representations?
Guest 644- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 1,214
Thank you for removing your comment about WHPS from your 'blog' Alexander.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
well done alexander for removing the comments
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
I removed one set of wording, Keith, but shall be adding more information to the article regarding the protected statuses of the area.
But my above question remains unanswered:
Are the comments on the DDC link supplied by Ray and Peter, representations?
I was advised to post my representation on that link under the comments sector.
It says 53 comments, of which only 9 are there, plus about 5 that are, however, unavailable for reading.
Are these comments representations? And if they are, why are most of them not there, and others unavailable?
Guest 651- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 5,673
Sounds more like you should be asking of DDC Alexander?
I'd be interested to hear how the Dover Town Council meeting went last night - any reports from anyone?
Been nice knowing you :)
Guest 750- Registered: 12 Apr 2012
- Posts: 72
Am sure Chris will update you Paul, keeping my thoughts to myself on this occasion!
Guest 675- Registered: 30 Jun 2008
- Posts: 1,610
To make it brief, the Town Council approved the plans' in outline' but have asked for assurances on the work proposed on the Western Heights, in particular that promised for the Drop Redoubt. They have also expressed great concern that the 30% affordable housing rule appears to have been set aside and are asking DDC for clarification.
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong.
Richard Armour
