Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Difference being Alexander im brave enough to predict all the main parties and how i think they will do
and who will win in an unbiased way
not some protest vote that might or might not stop one of the major parties winning seats
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Keith, as in my last post, I think the vast majority of people here, as things are standing now, will not bother voting at all at the next locals. Local candidates are usually bound to political parties, and the three main-stream parties in Parliament do not do what the People want.
And locally, all we hear is that "there is less and less money the Councils can spend".
Meanwhile, unemployment here is rampant.
Forget it, Keith!
Guest 705- Registered: 23 Sep 2010
- Posts: 661
Splendid Isolation!
Never give up...
Guest 705- Registered: 23 Sep 2010
- Posts: 661
Unemployment Rampant eh-the Romanians and the Bulgarians are coming!
Never give up...
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,895
UKIP are riding high in polls at the moment as a mid-term protest vote come the next General Election things will return to the norm even with the majority of EU sceptics.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Not according to Labour's policy chief it won't, Jan.
Jon Cruddas is campaigning for Britain to have an EU in/out referendum.
Boris Hairstyles from London also appears to be in favour. He's an eminent Tory.
Osborne knows he can't just print off another £50 billion in digital money to paste and patch the facade and prolong EU membership by another 6 months.
What Barry W doesn't tell you is that Government borrowing is going up, not down. Soon they'll be at the pensions,, in fact, they're already shaking up the pensions, but I forgot to read the headline article.
The Gov. had to choose now between benefits and pensions, and chose to pick on pensions, having already raided the benefit reserves.
Happy New Year!
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Alexander
you cant have it both ways
UKIP must have break throughs if it is to be taken seriously
by this i dont mean coming a close 3rd place
I mean winning seats
now It was raised that the county elections are the first ones to be held. so i put forward my view on what will happen,
You appear to have written off UKIP before a vote is even counted in the county elections which is interesting in itself.
Thats fine, but thats where it all starts from, then of course we have the general election unless UKIP wins a seat it will never be taken seriously
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 725- Registered: 7 Oct 2011
- Posts: 1,418
Vote for Milliband and vote for a complete and utter idiot who hasn't a clue how to run round to the shops let alone a country:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9799261/Wind-farm-contracts-to-increase-energy-bills-for-families.html
labour - a complete joke.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
He's clever enough to have got himself a £2 million house though.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 725- Registered: 7 Oct 2011
- Posts: 1,418
Indeed Peter although I wouldn't necessarily call that clever. Planet London is full of people who have made their riches by sitting on houses which have increased in price. It doesn't involve brain surgery although in Ed's case I think that might be just the thing that might give him some personality, some charisma and some idea of how the real world works outside of the sixth form.
He's the sort of bloke that when he walks into the pub people groan and mutter under their breath "Christ it's that idiot again coming in for his swift half just pretend you haven't noticed him".
A loser basically and has cost our country dear.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Peter
As you claim to be unbiased??? if you were you would be saying many of those in both the labour and conservative parties are doing much the same
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Yes Keith, but those on the right do not consider substantial wealth a source of shame.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
philip,some thing tells me thet you like milliband jnr,but please dont lump him with the rest of the idiots at westminster.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Peter
Think you should look at it from the other end(taxpayer)
The mouse estimated fortune £30million whilst some on benefits struggle to find there next meal
looking further at the mouse's fortune he recently paid off £75,000 of his mortgage
Then we have the second home in Oxfordshire
Taxpayer funded £350,000 mortgage
Source; the tory mail
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
So?
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
what.?
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
I don't really see what politicians' private financial arrangements have to do with the price of fish. Unless of course they claim to be socialists. A pretty rare breed, socialists, unless socialist=hypocrite,
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
or tory=hypocrite of course.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Like you say peter
to you it doesn't matter
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
It shouldn't matter what financial situation any poitician is in (rich or poor), but none of them can be described as poor - surely ?
There are many Labour MPs who have had a privileged upbringing - silver spoon and Oxford/Cambridge education, why should only Conservative MPs be singled out as being unsuitable to serve the people ?
Are you saying Keith that you need to be poor to represent the poor ?
Roger
