Terry Nunn
- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,316
Totally non-political comment Keith. I would have said the same about Batman and Robin.
Terry
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
you
non political terry??? uuuum
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Labour are now occupying campaigning territory that the Tories should have already achieved during their government, but decided not to.
UKIP are now saying that Labour have proven that UKIP were right all along with regards to open-door immigration.
If Ed Miliband follows Socialism all the way along the road, he will be telling the Country that we need Democracy, an EU in/out referendum and a Government that is there to administer to the needs and rights of its OWN People.
That combined with good relations with other countries on a FAIR trade bases, with good cultural relations on equal terms, and the necessity that a Government is voted by its own People and cannot put the interests of other people in front of their own People, would be the realisation of Socialism.
If he does this, then he will have a very large consensus among the electorate.
Terry Nunn- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,316
What makes you think I'm political Keith?
Terry
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
everyone has views terry
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
I know Terry can stand up for himself very ably, but I've never known him to be political - one of the most apolitical people I have ever known.
Roger
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
everyone has views
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Terry Nunn- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,316
Yes of course I have "views", but they are not dominated by blind party dogma. When I vote, I vote on the main issue at the time and my view on it irrespective of what party puts that view forward.
Thus it is that in my life I have always voted for what I consider to be the most sensible party. If it were polling day next Thursday I would be hard pushed to know who to vote for.
As Roger says, that's about as apolitical as you can get.
Terry
ps it doesn't matter anyway, the world ends on Friday!
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
like i said terry
everyone has a view
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
All party dogma is wrong. But some parties' dogma is more wrong than others. I vote for people whom I know; and whom I trust to do their best for their constituents; and whom I beilieve will be less influenced by dogma and more by common sense.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
I'm sure all candidates set out to do just that
unfortunatly many fall by the way side for a number of differing reasons
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
oh well lifes a bitch for what ever happens.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
sure theres a positive in there somewhere and a viewpoint
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
i must admit i would be hard pushed to know who to vote for if a general election was called for tomorrow.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
and me
one things for sureit wouldn't be the tories
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
You know you would vote Labour Keith, no matter the quality of their candidate or any other.
Roger
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
roger,better the devil you know than the one you dont,and each to there own.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
last i read from keith on here was that he would be campaigning against the reds at the next general election due to his disquiet over the selection process.
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
I remember that too Howard, but I can't get my head round Keith not voting Labour - can you ?
Roger
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Keith is campaigning for Labour voters to abstain or spoil their ballots in protest against the women-only shortlist. If he really wants to make his mark, I believe a better way would be for him to stump up the £500 deposit and stand as an independent socialist candidate. Reg might even help him out with the dosh.......
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
