Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
I don't recognise either.
Guest 904- Registered: 21 Mar 2013
- Posts: 312
I see the Flat Earth Society (Dover) representative has crawled out of the woodwork again, did you have to rattle his cage Keith?
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Why not Paul
At least he admits the Queen is head of church
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
That is a mouth-frothing statement in post 23, Keith.
I have never stated any such thing.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Alexander
Let me put this a slightly different way, to help you.
Although the Queen is recognised as the Head of the Church by the Church of England
and the country
You may well hold a different view.
that's not to say that anything is going to change, nor is a there many people that bothered about changing it
or people support the queen as head of the church.
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
So who is the head of the Church of England, Alex?
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
please don't confuse him peter lol
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
OK Peter, the C/E recognises the hereditary member of the house of Windsor as its head.
This we all know and most of us already knew before I explained it to Keith some months ago.
Keith turned it around and is trying to explain it back to me, although I actually informed Keith of this.
But sometimes Keith gets mixed up and goes on to state that the queen is "head of the church".
For some reason Keith categorically ignores that the C/E Christ Church in Dover was knocked down during the queen's reign.
It's hard to be head of a church that no longer stands!
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Alexander
thankyou for coming round and agreeing the church of England fully supports the queen as its head.
you will find my comments like you say have always been in reply to your comments
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Not in Folkestone Road it doesn't, Keith!
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
not surprisingly after reading your posts lately
you again get confused??? or maybe in a deliberate way???
People on the Folkestone Road, and in the UK recognise the queen as the head of the Church
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Which Church, Keith?
Some people recognise the pope as head of the Church.
Others profess Christ as Head of the Church.
Perhaps the Church of England will reassess its position on the queen.
Furthermore, here in Fokestone Road there is no more C/E church, it's been demolished!
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Keith, according to a report, the Church of England risks being wiped out.
Perhaps the Church of England will reconnect to its origins and foundations in Kent and Northumbria, and acknowledge Christ alone as its Head, and no other!
You are the only person who seems to be banging on and on that the queen and her descendants will be "the head" forever ...and ever ... end ever... of everything ....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8626410/Church-of-England-faces-being-wiped-out-report-warns.htmlKeith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Alexander
I think you will find its the country that BANGS ON ABOUT(your words) the queen is the head of the church,
having now got you to agree that the queen IS the head of the church we can now look to see the next step.
Like politicians, the church's have a problem in getting there message across9although the catholics in Dover appear to fill there churchs)
As i'V said, there appears to be no mood to change the queen as head of church, in fact quite the opposite
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 756- Registered: 6 Jun 2012
- Posts: 727
Why does religion cause so many rows?
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
this is more about point scoring than religion lesley.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
not at all howard
you don't find me argueing just debating
if someone who holds such strong views says the queen isn't the head of church that's incorrect
iv challenged that and alexander has now agreed
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 756- Registered: 6 Jun 2012
- Posts: 727
Boring, maybe we should have rules like that game on radio, no hesitation, no repetition etc.....
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Lesley, this is all about Keith Sansum continually trying to ram any comment I make on anything by repeating in obsession that his queen is "my head" and the "head of my church" and that "I have agreed", even if I am involved in some debate with someone else on a completely unrelated issue.
I have been continually responding to this deranged provocation of KeithS, which is what he is aiming for, because he keeps coming out with "Alexander has agreed". Which leaves me with no other option than to post.
The best thing is for me to ignore KeithS posts altogether, and I think I stopped posting for 2 months precisely because of KeithS deranged posts addressed to me in which he claims "I agreed".
This time I'll ignore him altogether.
If I don't recognise the queen as head of the English Church, which I don't, then KeithS should stop claiming in public that "I agreed" with his opposite views, and then trying to ram down my throat that she is the "head of my church!.".
He has made this deranged claim over and again.
It is a condition, probably coming from harassment and bullying, and appears typical of a commissar mentality type 1984.
The problem is that I always answer back and don't let any grubby commissar put me down.
KeithS can keep his queen for himself and his own church.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
I would have told a Stalin commissar exactly the same, by the way!
The fact is, Alexander does not swear oaths of allegiance to mortal people or recognise them as his "head".
As far as I'm concerned, mortal people are all equal.
Furthermore, I have my own head, and don't need any 1984-style commissar ramming ...**... down my throat.