Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#881
Ross correct me if I am wrong.My understanding was individual shareholders voted against and the institutions voted for!
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
#882
No - Many UK institutions voted against but overseas institutional and individual shareholders voted for. Perhaps from a distance and not caught up in a witch-hunt they had a clearer perspective specially as Barclays are one of the better run banks - mind you that is only relative to other banks.
Regardless of that, I fully approve of shareholders holding the executive to account and any exercise in shareholder opinion is good and would fully support strengthening their powers.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#883
that is my understanding of the situation.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#884
First snipet of the `Rich List`Wealth sqeeze for couple who think nothing of spending £ 6 million on a birthday party.
Sir Phillip Green has lost £ 1 Billion from an estimated worth in the `Rich List`
Sunday Times `Rich List`says his fortune has reduced from £ 4.2 billion to £ 3.3 billion.......hard times ahead!
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#885
BARRYW;
Shareholders holding a say, in reality they have little say, but yes if there
views can have teeth i'm all for it, but unlikely
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
#886
Blimey nearly at the 1000
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#887
barryw;
I wonder what powers you suggest shareholders could have
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
#888
The ones they already have is a good place to start.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#889
not judging by the shareholder revolt yesterday, middle england having their say about reg's elite greedy pigs.
the result was always a formality.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#890
shareholders have a very small say
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
#891
I am beginning to despair of any genuinely knowledgeable contributions. Speculation is useful, bit not when it is presented as absolute fact.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#892
im sure bern the everyday shareholder would like even as barryw s suggests more power with teeth
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#893
are you calling barry a rotwieler kieth.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#894
barryw and i will not agree on much
but he has a right to post
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
#895
What is your obsession with the right to post? I think we have agreed that is the case, despite falling outs and disagreements. let's move on.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#896
POST AWAY,,,,,,,,
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#897
not all of us are taken in by the views of the pseudo elite.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#898
you said it howard
but i'm trying to be polite
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
#899
Pseudo, or gobbledegook, are terms used when people don't understand something. No shame in not understanding something, just ask or learn. But there is shame in rubbishing something just because it is not on your radar.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#900
hopefully bern we are not going down the barryw road of
only i understand
as i have said before there is a wealth(non monetary lol) of views/expertese on this forum and long may it continue.
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS