Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Ed Miliband labour party employment law
Ed Miliband has solved the zero hour's contracts problem
He will introduce a mandatory cut of to this contract after one year's employment
So the boss will sack his worker after 11 months 29 days service.
Then re employ to start the contract over.
A true champion of the workers.
Over to you martin.
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
All the fault of the Immigrants don't you know
Audere est facere.
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
Why mention immigrants Martin?
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
just looked in then logged in, invasion of the ukip's.
not a problem everyone is entitled to post their views.
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
David
Because martin cannot explain the foolishness and out of touch mentality , of the man he is promoting for PM
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
ukips thread bare david,ukip is full of them.
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
Having been up most of the night with the overseas news on.
All our partys are not showing up good so one must put it down to their leaders and some of their members.
All party have their right and left ways of thinking and voice it.
UKIP have of late got the ones joining them from all groups of far left to far right.
You might aske"why has that happen"very easy to point that out'
It is because they found it very easy to make it up the ladder so they can be put up as cllrs and MP
Up to about two years ago UKIP was a small party plodding along then overnight they were pushed into the limelight.
Their leader was ready for that but the party was not they had only had a few working at their head office most were part time.
So when all the public rushed to join them they could not vet most who wanted to get rolls of cllrs and MP and that is now showing up.
They were told this would happen years ago but they did not act on it.
Even I told them myself at a top meeting .
I must say that is why I as a member of UKIP at that the time told them that the person standing for Dover West was not the right person and that I found myself for the good of that ward standing against my own party and that is why I was removed from UKIP.
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
David Little wrote:Why mention immigrants Martin?
That seems to be Keiths answer to all our woes
Audere est facere.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
you are right there martin,he [kieth] blames them for every thing.
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
Keith Bibby wrote:David
Because martin cannot explain the foolishness and out of touch mentality , of the man he is promoting for PM
Martin has no wish to explain or try and explain, as I have said before I am just a normal voter, I am not a politician or activist and have no wish to be, not sure where I have been promoting Ed? I appreciate that Labour supporters on here are very thin on the ground with those that were hounded off, if the politics forum had been made available much earlier it would have probably have seen them still on here and then you could have the argument you seem to so desperately want.
Audere est facere.
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
So, a thread about ed Milliband turns into a UKIP bandwagon.
We can smell the fear
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
There is no fear but the last thing Dover needs now is vote in the wrong party.
AT this time the Dover voter should keep it the same district council one or two posts that cllrs hold down up there need a change as for the MP none look good to me.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
#10, Martin, I don't think the two main apologists for Labour who left the forum were 'hounded off'. I think they stomped off in high dudgeon at the idea that some people didn't want to read their views and the forum management felt the political threads should be isolated for the sake of the sensitive souls who didn't want to read them.
Or was it my fault? Did they get the hump because I called them Statler and Waldorf?
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
Peter you are entitled to your opinion, to me they were hounded off as Tom was before them, the anti political feeling that festered on here could have been resolved by the introduction of the politics thread long before it was. I still feel UKIP have hijacked the forum and the red and blue elements have all but disappeared. I must point out that I have never met Keith Reg Tom or anyone else on here as far as I know, whether they resemble any of the Muppets I have no idea
Audere est facere.
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,879
I agree Peter, they behaved like children who could not get their own way.
I much prefer the atmosphere now without the baiting, confrontation and aggression we sometimes seemed to get.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
To true Mrs Higgins a lot better this way.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
keiith, reg and tom are still members and can post if they choose to.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Martin, the pendulum swings to and fro. David Little got the hump last year and stomped off as well, now he's back.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
Peter Garstin wrote:Martin, the pendulum swings to and fro. David Little got the hump last year and stomped off as well, now he's back.
Probably because Keith had gone? but hey Keith Bibby wanting a row over Ed Miliband started this, I am not the man to have a political debate with, I am nowhere near knowledgeable enough for that, great believer in right or wrong and fairness no more than that.
Audere est facere.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
The f word. One man's fairness is another's grave injustice. Keith always used to demand fairness but without defining it. It's not an absolute concept, it's highly subjective and woolly.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
