Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
so the next steps,,,,,,,,,,
1; cameron to ditch the lib dems and go alone pleasing his back benchers
2; cameron to stick with cleggy, hunt, osbourne and the motley crew
and we end up in any even worse mess of u turns, non leeadership,
fiasco after fiasco
but hey its all the lib dems fault aint it?????
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
You clearly just ignore what is actually said reg because reality does not accord with what you prefer to believe. You have said it again about 'controlling the world economy' - that cannot be done though you may want an authoritarian communist or fascist world state to do so, even such dreadful states have always collapsed in failure.
Germany did not spend recklessly and are prospering (though partly at the expense of the PIIGS), Australia prospers, New Zealand, Canada, most Far East countries also. All are threatened to some extent by the big spending Eurozone and other irresponsible countries.
Big spending, high taxing, high interfering deficit spending countries are the root cause of all our economic problems unlike these countries that have run responsible fiscal policies. The UK government is one of those that are part of the problem, of course, because of the massive deficit spending during the growth years by 'I banned boom and bust' Brown.
We could be more like the Canada's and Australia's and be more able to deal with the Eurozone issue and would not be facing massive public spending cuts if, from 2000, Brown had been sensible.
You will ignore this, of course, or make some daft comment like 'gobbldegook (do you know what that means?) simply because you have no answers and the facts do not match what you want.