Ray!
In the past I have had disputes with you over wrong claims of yours concerning my posts on internet, and in each case proved you wrong.
This time too:
I am light-years ahead of you in all things concerning knowledge of internet page-ranking. Quite clearly you have no knowledge of simple verification methods to detect online plagiarism, of which you accuse me.
If you want to examine whether an online text is plagiarised, just copy a line of the text, paste it on the internet search engine (Google, Yahoo or whichever), and the original text will always come up first. The plagiarised text will never come up first, as the crawl spiders of search engines are designed to detect plagiarism.
So if you copy any individual line in my post 1, and paste it into the search bracket of Google or Bing or any other search engine, you will see that the first result to come up, at the top of page 1, is Dover Forum, with the post that is on this very thread.
This is proof that my post 1 is original!!
Had it been plagiarised, the original online text to come up on the top of page 1 would be the one I had plagiarised it from. that is, IF I had plagiarised!
So please do the test, you can repeat it with any phrase I have written in post 1, and each time you will see that the original text to come up is, yes you've guessed it, Dover Forum and this thread!
Quite obviously nothing plagiarised there, then!
As any reader on the Forum can try it out, and see that your plagiarism accusation is false, hope you get red ears, Ray, for being found out as a fibber
