Post 37
"Alexander
"your critical of your very own head of the church"
Keith Sansum started off with drivel (see above from post 37), I then explained to him that this thread is about politics and nothing to do with his drivel-comment on post 37, and he has gone on sounding off this same drivel on this and another thread at the same time.
He keeps claiming that his queen is my head and that she has replaced Christ in my Christian Faith (which is what he is implying).
KeithS then goes on to repeat the same mouth-froth all the time, claiming that "I have agreed", and using my name.
While I have been telling him that he's frothing at the mouth and has a disorder, I found it unpleasant that Paul Isles then joined in too, as clearly this has nothing to do with a discussion.
Paul, if two men are in a row, keep out and let them get on, don't take one from behind, which is unfair!
If KeithS continues attributing to me a phrase I haven't used, and using my name, concerning my Christian Faith, I will continue to remind him of his disorder.
Alternatively, KeithS can stop using my name to attribute a lie and claiming I "have agreed".
If he continues, it may become unpleasant as there is a whole gamma of vocabulary to describe this "condition", without ever using offensive words of-course.
Drivel is not actually the right word, there are some technical words.