Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
13 October 2010
13:2374807#21
That would be: S.S.E.S., the name of a new state, something for Howard's opening phrase of his proposed book!
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
13 October 2010
15:4374823#22
barryw,so you think that the euro/europe are crap and not worthy,thats youe opinion fair enough.so what if you are wrong and this takes us in fully intergrated and useing euro as currency,will you still vote and still be a tory then.or will your tune and atitude change.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
13 October 2010
17:0074830#23
Brian - Please re-word that in a manner so I can understand exactly what you are saying.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
13 October 2010
17:0374831#24
barryw,try reading it slowly,bit by bit.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
13 October 2010
17:1774833#25
my understanding is that brian is asking the following.
further integration seems to be on the cards under the present government, should it reach the unlikely stage where we join the currency too, would barry remain in the blue party?
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
13 October 2010
17:5674837#26
I detect back-pedalling on Europe by the Tory side of the coalition. Further integration is such a vote-loser it is highly unlikely to happen.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
13 October 2010
18:0874839#27
Yeah I think Howard worded Brian's question in Oxford English. So Barry, what's it to be? Sveral people here wish to know your reply!
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
13 October 2010
19:2374877#28
actully my post was in cambridge english,come on barryw cough up some answers.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
13 October 2010
21:1774920#29
Brian - better that you type a little more carefully and, perhaps think through exactly what you are trying to say. I cannot understand your point, though I suspect it is not a serious one.
I am not sure you are right in your translation from the gobbeldegook. It is a long way from reality, a fantasy.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
13 October 2010
21:2474922#30
nice try barry, i thought i had clarified what brian meant in post 25.
would be interesting to hear the views of john buckley on this one.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
13 October 2010
21:4774925#31
Barry, whatever you state here might be used against you at the next General Elections campaign!
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
13 October 2010
21:4974926#32
Howard - if your interpretation is correct then it is built on a falacy. First of all the Conservatives will not, under any circumstance and on principal, never take us into the Euro. In addition any more transfer of powers to the EU without a referendum will not be accepted by the Party either. The good news is that DC, George Osborne and William Hague are fully in tune with these Eurosceptic feelings. Sad that we are lumbered in coalition with EU fanatics.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
13 October 2010
21:5174927#33
I will not be a candidate or election organiser Alexander - so nothing can be used against me in any campaign.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
13 October 2010
21:5274929#34
Just trying to get you to cough up a reply to the question that was posed to you, Barry!
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
13 October 2010
21:5574932#35
I have not seen an intelligent question worth the trouble of a reply Alexander.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
13 October 2010
21:5574933#36
Oh Barry! Oxford English! Reread your phrase, you just stated that the Tories will take us into the euro!
Now reword that Barry! never... ever...
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
13 October 2010
21:5574934#37
Now you have seen something worth the trouble of replying, Barry!
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
13 October 2010
21:5674935#38
not and never, same sentence - OK - you know what I meant!"
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
13 October 2010
21:5874937#39
No, double negative here means the opposite!
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
13 October 2010
21:5974938#40
It's serious, because it could be used to obtain the opposite, and attributed to you, Barry! I mean, on suuuuuch a serious question!