howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
Just donate every part of that paedophile howard, job done
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
did you graduate from the keith bibby academy for law david?
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
Nah Keiths a bit soft for me. I'd rather conduct experiments on paedos than beagles
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
mmm intressting,what would eric pikles leave.well it wouldnt be his brain,i doubt if they could find it.may be his body so they could find a cure for obestatie.
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
Re Pickles I am sure there is more than enough to go round
Audere est facere.
Guest 700- Registered: 11 Jun 2010
- Posts: 2,868
the bodies of criminals who were hanged were used for dissection, at one time, viz:
Kentish Gazette Tues Aug 4 1818 page 3 col.3 reports the result of the trial of HUSSEY the murderer.
The Jury consulted for 8 to 10 minutes and then returned verdict of Guilty.
On back page of same paper: col.4: Describes HUSSEY after the trial and his execution.
HUSSEY said he had never committed the murder but knew who had done it, HUSSEY said he was involved with the theft.
After the body had hung the usual time it was cut down and delivered to Messrs DAY and WHATMAN for dissection.
---------------------------------------------------
Lincolnshire Born and Bred
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
I don't like Eric Pickles very much, but I thought that was very poor of you David to call him a Paedophile.
Roger
Guest 703- Registered: 30 Jul 2010
- Posts: 2,096
Roger, I think you'll find he was referring to someone in another thread, had me confused at first!
http://www.doverforum.com/letters/viewtopic.php?id=11052howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
well cleared up ray, david is not one for unpleasant posts.
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
Oh O.K. Thanks Ray and Howard.
Sorry David.
Roger
Terry Nunn
- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,316
I carry a card and am logged on some government file that when I croak it they can have whatever they like. Assuming of course that they find anything that is not too decrepit to use.
Terry
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
Well done Terry.
I am a donor too. It's a pity that organ donoring is such a difficult thing to promote more.
Roger
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,895
I am also registered and am in favour of people having to opt out of being a donor rather than opt in, also think it is wrong that next of kin can go against a donors wishes and say no.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 710- Registered: 28 Feb 2011
- Posts: 6,950
On your last point Jan...
You are in a car crash, your chances are slim, but there is a chance. Should your loved ones stand by and see that slim chance thrown away?
Ignorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,895
I am talking about when the doctors have already said you are brain dead certainly not when there is a chance of recovery.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
Exactly Jan.
No one allows people to die just so they can take a piece for someone else, it really doesn't work like that.
As Jan says, it would a hell of a difference to those waiting for a transplant, if people had to opt out of donorship, rather than opting in.
You are also so right Jan that relatrives can go against the donors wishes after they've died.
It's the spirit and memory that lives on, not the flesh and if the flesh (body parts) can be used to keep someone else alive, or make their life worth living, that is what must be done.
Roger