A learned missive from today's paper...
"David Cameron eschews a "culture of entitlement". But surely that is precisely what a liberal democracy is supposed to aspire to: a society in which we are entitled as citizens not only to vote and to freedom under the law, but - in the words of the universal declaration of human rights - to "security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability ... or other lack of livelihood", and to "work, to free choice of employment [and] to just and favourable conditions of work".
The idea of social security has effectively been banished (across the political spectrum) in favour of a language in which "welfare", far from being a celebrated ideal, has become a dirty word. Why should we not be able to expect a basic level of security over the course of our lives and to have access to decent jobs? The revelations about the plight of the "cliff-edge" households (Report, 19 June) demonstrate that work is no longer the best form of welfare. The problem is not a culture of entitlement, but a culture of exploitation and indifference to need.
Professor Hartley Dean
Co-editor, Journal of Social Policy"
Source...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/jun/25/welfare-should-be-celebratedIgnorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.