Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,579
Brian
you have on here given opinions you would like to see the conservatives out of office, and rightly very critical of them.
anyway
bungling boris saga will be interesting as it opens up
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Cameron is ``apparently``alarmed by last months `contraction` in the UK economy of
0.7 %.
He has sent out letters to all ministry departments to get their fingers out and
concentrate on economic growth.
He has pick out the depatment of business....Cable....for failing the most....
Lib / Dem bashing ?
Another blow to the lack of economic growth problem is that the Manufacturing in UK
has seen the biggest fall in output in several years and construction is in danger of
losing a ``generation of Talent``due to the Government not taking steps to boost
``infrastructure``spending...one of the main items to help economic growth.........
......what a shambles....
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
``Italy stuck in downward austerity spiral,official figures show its sclerotic economy
shrank at the fastest pace for 3 years to ``0.7 %``` slide,extending its double dip
recession.Italy grappling with surging unemployment.``
.....................Sound familiar......# 142.......
``Cameron is ``apparently``alarmed by last months `contraction` in the UK
economy of ``0.7 %``.......
Another blow to the lack of economic growth problem is that the Manufacturing in UK
has seen the biggest fall in output in several years and construction is in danger of
losing a ``generation of Talent``due to the Government not taking steps to boost
``infrastructure``spending...one of the main items to help economic growth.``
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
good grief reg,i see you took a leaf out of barrys book,the euro bashing chapter.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Cameron unwilling to give way on boundary changes....Clegg will instruct Lib /Dems
to vote down the measures ....game on.....
Cameron would not answer on whether Lib /Dems would be deemed to be in breach of
ministerial code if they voted against what was at the outset a government agreed
measure.If he were to make such a dramatic ruling,he would in effect be spelling the
end of the Coalition.
It is more likely that he will seek to embarrass the Lib /Dems politically over their
sudden opposition to boundary reform.....watch this space....
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Boundary changes can be stopped,says Cable.
The Coalition battle over constutional reform has intensified with Cable expressing
confidence that in alliance with Labour his party could defeat any attempt by Cameron
to force through Parliamentry boundary changes next year.
He added `We have taken the view that if we can`t get the support of the
Conservatives to pursue House of Lords reform we don`t see why we should support
constitutional change,which they are very anxious to have......if it goes to a vote the
Conservatives alone do not have enough.......
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
i don't think the issue of boundary changes should be trusted to politicians for obvious reasons.
the plan is for all constituencies to be very nearly the same size, all it needs is someone to run a software programme to sort it out.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,579
howard political parties have in the past attempted to sway theboundaries the latest being the tories weho would gain so much by the changes and both lsabour and the lib dems would have lost out.
the lib dems were to go along with it all even though political suicide to the lib dems,
but the lords reforms ditched by the tories(agreed between the tories and lib dems) has got the lib dems up in arms and now open warfare has broken out between the tories and lib dem
each day we see them tearing each other apart
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
The next Parliamentry Session will be different.
Cameron needs Clegg more than Clegg needs Cameron.
The Tories are stuck and Clegg is expected to take every opportunity to remind
Cameron of this`unpalatable`truth.Clegg is now ready to show some muscle.........
The Olympics have not had an effect on the feel good factor for the Coalition.ICM Poll
shows that only 16 % believe the Coalition Government will last full term........
Osborne`s credibility with the public was lost months ago but held firm with the rich
and wealthy.but new survey of 1,000 millionaires shows they now have lost faith in
Osborne.........
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Cameron to turn to his right wingers in his Cabinet reshuffle.
That is bad news for those of us wanting the rich and wealthy to join in to pay their fair
share to relieve the austerity on the majority of us ......but it could reduce the time
this Government is in power....all depends on Cleggy and the Lib /Dems.....not holding
breath.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,579
Theres some serious issues out there and with the lib dems looking very shaky
who will give first?
the tories are so far behind in the polls that they will be desperate for lib dem support.
but at next election the lib dems are like;ly to be wiped out or nearly
and cable and co are going behind cleggs back and geting ready for a deal with labour.
it aint looking good for the cobbled together govt
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
Keith, would you accept a lib/lab coalition in the event of a hung parliament?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,579
david
'im no conservative supporter never have been
but im also no great fan of the let down lib dems
more recently labour not got the answers either
so for me its the ones that will do the best for us all
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 714- Registered: 14 Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,594
Well swerved Keith, you loathe the libs but are so desperate for power you'd jump into bed with them. Labour pleaded with the libs to form a coalition after the GE then acted like a spurned boyfriend.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
no david they didn't.
gordon brown showed no interest despite nick clegg, alex salmond and other smaller parties wanting to form a "progressive alliance".
as things stand i don't think a coalition is likely the next time anyway.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,579
david;
let me make it clear, i would prefer an outright labour majority if they were that is to be more for the people, rather than trying to be better at being tories, than the tories themselves.
no i wouldn't want the lib dems as they are so unreliable, but if it keeps the tories out then it should be a consideration although far from perfect.
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Defence Minister Phillip Hammond caused Senior Military Commanders much concern
when he indicated his intention to push through a creeping Privatisation with his cuts to
the forces.
Today he admits the Private Sector are inadequate to provide many public services.
Perhaps he should advise a few of his Cabinet Ministers,especially Mr Lansley.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Once again Cameron grabs the glory headlines giving his complete support to future
British Sport following Britain`s success trying to outdo Boris`s great Olympics with
his miserable one.
Once again all talk and no action and retrograde policies to back up his headline
fetish.
Whilst he is milking the British Olympic glory.......Gove`s policies are shedding school
sports fields.
Typical of Cameron to claim and enjoy the success borne from the school children of
another administration................
Our schools should be the foundation of British Sport.
Is this the way to run a Dance Hall ?
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Perhaps Reg can tell us how many school playing fields were sold off under Labour. All I know is that it was rather a lot, driven by an anti-competitive ethos is too many state schools.
I really do not know why I bother to sometimes comment on Reg's rather sad point scoring obsessions, best ignored.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
barry can you all so tell us why the conservatives are making school playing fields smaller.