• The post you are reporting:
   
  Alexander all that you prove is that you know nothing about how the economy works or anything about what you talk about.
  
  All the entrepreneurs you refer to would love their small businesses to be huge successes, tomorrow's Microsoft and become 'super-rich'. Its called aspiration and without it people will not invest, will not take risks. Why bother if what you make risks getting confiscated. Microsoft, Apple etc were all small businesses once.
  
  Of course people want to keep their own assets and property, why on earth should they not? Why should people not want to increase their assets however much they have? Good for them because to do that they will to invest money in existing businesses or start new enterprises - all of which add to employment and growth providing jobs. Maybe they spend it too, good - because that means money is being spent in shops, good are being produced to feed that demand and in so doing jobs are produced....
  
  Wealth redistribution as you suggest would be stealing the assets from people to give to to others who sit on their backsides doing nothing. We have enough problems now with a tax system doing just that - rewarding people for doing nothing while taking it off those who work. Doing it on the scale you suggest is plain bonkers and it is wrong and impractical on so many level, immoral and dangerous.
  
  Absolute rubbish Alexander - there are just not the words to describe how demented your confiscatory ideas are and the complete disaster they would be for any economy. It would be an end to inward investment, dictatorial government, an end to aspiration and a country destined for third world status.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason