The post you are reporting:
For decades Labour's had internal tensions between its eternal-student tendency and its US junkie tendency. (Many, of course, move from the former to the latter - Blair, many of his cabinet, and Starmer were activists in various Trotskyist groups, the IMG, Pabloites etc. BTW, this doesn't mean their ideological attachments changed; just their means of achieving them.) Much of the time the two align perfectly (blm, lgbtq..., covid heavy manners, 'climate change', and most recently the 'Slava Ukraini' cult), but these are now all either bust or in the process of busting.
The Palestine-Israel pull within Labour perfectly maps onto these two broad tendencies, and this, combined with Labour's open borders immigration position, is about to bear some very juicy fruit for it (and for us, too, I suspect), and it will not be able to dissociate itself from the consequences.
The recent incoherent mumbling and blathering performances by Lammy and Starmer only make sense if seen in the light of US foreign policy objectives. But that ship is holed and sinking. If there are zero Conservative politicians who understand this and show any appreciation whatsoever of geopolitical complexities and realities, there are fewer of these in Labour.
Finally (wrt Evans' email), isn't the sheer number of -isms and -phobias any Labour member needs to negotiate nowadays incredible? It must mean that any Party meeting, even a local one, has to be attended by some political enforcer from Central Committee.
