Reginald Barrington wrote:Oh please! The facts of the case as presented by the prosecution.
It is at the lower end of sexual assualt just above Hand on bum and stolen kiss.
The man was an idiot, but he thought his luck was in with a younger woman, one in his home while wife was away, the other met him again in private having been sexually assaulted once already.
Certainly not the behaviour of a sexual predator, but that of a sexual incompetent! Then the idiot doubled down with the lies, for that he deserves the strongest sentence.
You're missing my point entirely. Whatever she did after the event is irrelevant to the alleged crime. I'm guessing you've never been called for jury service but, if you had been, you would know that the judge would have made that quite clear in the summing up.