The post you are reporting:
Back in 1992, I took the case for Western Heights to be declared an Ancient Monument to a Public Inquiry ... and was successful. Indeed, I was so successful that the Inspector was scathing of DDC and introduced a number of other caveats.
However, DDC, with its usual determination to destroy Dover's history
- Witness the destruction of the Roman remains to build the White Elephant.
- The nauseating attack on Brian Philp in an effort to get the Roman Painted House shut down.
- The demolition of Brook House
- The virtual closure to the general public of the Town Hall - the Maison Dieu
- And so on and on...
Have decided to over-rule the decision, with regards to Western heights, that has been legally binding since 1993.
Yesterday I wrote the following letter to Mr Aziz, DDC's extremely well paid Chief Executive:
I keep reading and hearing rumours of a planned development on Western Heights which will include a good deal of housing. The pay-back, to Dover will, besides the Council tax that Dover District Council will accrue, the possible upgrading of the Drop Redoubt.
You are, of course, aware that I successfully presented the argument against a similar proposed development in 1992 at a Public Inquiry. Indeed, the Inspector, Mr Stoddart, made a number of recommendations, one of which was designating the site as an Ancient Monument. All of the recommendations the Dover District Council of the time adhered to as they felt that it would be too expensive to undertake a legal challenge.
Indeed, English Heritage were of the same mind and as they were/are responsible for the Ancient Monument designation they too adhered.
I sought legal advice and this morning I was informed that the 1993 ruling still stands as it was not challenged at the time.
A few weeks ago the Dover Mercury raised this with DDC, to be told, in essence, that the decision was originally made following a Local Plan Inquiry and that this has now been superseded.
I have been advised to point out to you that because of the designations put in force in 1993 - and not challenged at the time - it is incumbent on DDC to hold a full Public Inquiry to have them legally rescinded.
I trust that you will give serious thought to this and not treat the above as you have with regards to other serious matters, by sending me a threatening letter saying, in essence, shut up or legal action will be taken.
Lorraine Sencicle
