Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
14 September 2010
17:0870594This Goverment is trying to get rid of the Royal ports,now turn on the Queen by saying there will not be a Queens Speech next year,are we now seeing the the run down of our own Queen and Royal family.will we still have a Queen or King in ten years time/,I did not think we would see this under a Blue Goverment ,we are moving more and more into the E.U.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
14 September 2010
17:1070595VIC
And where is this info from
not looking good for this cobbled together govt
still think they will go 18 months
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
14 September 2010
17:2470598The newspaper today ,the headline is The Queen is silenced.
The Government yesterday said there will be no Queen,s Speech next year.
Commons leader Sir George Young said the next address, in which new legislation is outlined will be in May 2012.
Angry Labour MPs said ministers were trying to"grab power"by giving themselves more time to push through controversial measures.
I think that way to how low will this Government go before we go back to the polls.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
14 September 2010
17:3070600i doubt that her majesty will be too bothered, she only reads out what dave and nick write for her.
what newspaper was it in vic?
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
14 September 2010
17:3370601It was in the Sun today,and as you know that they support the Blues.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
14 September 2010
17:4170604not always the most reliable of organs vic, they have been known to exaggerate things in the past.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
14 September 2010
17:4870605ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
14 September 2010
18:2570615Vic - please dont be silly.
The government, unlike Labour's, is not one made up of a bunch of closet republicans who removed HMQ's picture from government offices (now restored in place...)
All that is being done is to change the timing of the State opening of Parliament to the spring, instead of it being in the Autumn and that means this will be a longer session of parliament. This is quite sensible, anyway given the heavy legislative burden laid out in the last Queens Speech it needs time to be enacted.
The next opening of Parliament will therefore be the spring of 2012 instead of the autumn of 2011, 6 months later.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
14 September 2010
18:2870616I suppose Barryw
you think you have fooled everyone
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
14 September 2010
18:2970618What on earth are you saying Keith? - you do not make any sense at all.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
14 September 2010
18:3170620VIC
Looks like you have hit on something here
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
14 September 2010
18:3170621All it is that the blues need a easy run without telling us anything.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
14 September 2010
19:0970637closet republicans barry?
i doubt that, most people don't give a thought about the monarchy nowadays.
the queen is seen as an excellent figurehead, behaves in a way befitting her position mostly.
the fact that she refuses to abdicate indicates that she has strong reservations about any of her family taking over.
14 September 2010
20:4870664Elizabeth, as do all monarchs when being crowned, take an oath to serve the country and people for the rest of their life. She is abiding by that royal oath. I expect her to reign until death, she is of that character.
To suggest that she refused to abdicate, suggests she has been asked. Where is the evidence for this or is it just flippant tabloidism?
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,894
14 September 2010
22:1870710So there is someone who believes what the Sun print.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
14 September 2010
22:2270712I Dont
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
14 September 2010
22:2470717It was not only in the sun but also on the news this morning.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
14 September 2010
22:2870719how can you positively doubt the editorial content of the currant bun jan?
i have avidly followed the political column on page 3 for decades.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
14 September 2010
22:3270723ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
14 September 2010
23:4270765
