Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
barry barry barry,as it stands the tax paying public who still have jobs and paying there fair share of tax,but i must remind you that these hard working are decreasing by the day.so my point is that with less tax comeing in and higher benifit bill going out.the fore coming question will be how can the afford to benifits with no income coming in.so why not get the tax dodgers to cough up there dues and reinvest it into britisk firms who are dumping workers and giveing them long contracts to get our econamy a boost witch it badly needs.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
You still do not get or understand the point - perhaps deliberately.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
# 8 In the real world Joe Public.Postman etc,etc,do not need financial advisors to deal with the `legal`options available to them because there only a few to have and they are so obviously freely identified.
When you have a bit more money coming in you have an accountant who identifies the many other options available.
We are not all in this together.We need the tax system restructured,simplified,fairer.pro rata.
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
Reg - I can assure you that they have many options available and do need advice. I have 22 years experience having seen many hundreds of people to back me up in this.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
One must never question someones knowledge or experience on any subject..............it is extremely bad form.
However we,as on other occasions,beg to differ...................after all we all need to earn a crust!
Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
LOL Reg - beg to differ indeed and would it be boring if we did not!