Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#1
Today stuart hall famous broadcaster was found guilty of sexual assault of 13 girls one being as young as 9!!!
This horrid man was denying all these charges only a few weeks ago
he has finaly admitted it all and found guilty and will be charged in june
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#2
exactly the same scenario as the jonathan king case, all the complainants gave similar accounts despite never having met one another.
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#3
not quite found guilty yet kieth,he has only admitted to it in court,trial to start in the next couple of months.
Guest 710- Registered: 28 Feb 2011
- Posts: 6,950
#4
"Stuart Hall, the veteran BBC broadcaster, has been described as an "opportunistic predator" by the Crown Prosecution Service after he admitted to a string of historic sex offences against girls.
Three months after dismissing the allegations as "pernicious, callous, cruel and, above all, spurious", the 83-year-old was forced to admit that his accusers had been telling the truth.
Hall, of Wilmslow, Cheshire, first made the admissions at a brief hearing at Preston crown court on 16 April. But they could not be reported because he was facing trial over an allegation that he raped a 22-year-old woman in 1976. On Thursday it emerged that the rape case had been left to lie on the file, along with three other allegations of indecent assault.
Hall, wearing a dark blue suit and striped tie, stood in the well of the court as Judge Anthony Russell set him free on bail but told him he would pass sentence on 17 June..."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/02/stuart-hall-admits-sexual-abuse-girlsIgnorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.
Jan Higgins
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#5
What a shame that it took so long for him to be found out. I am surprised he was allowed bail I wonder if it is usual in a paedophile case or has his age etc played a part in his release.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#6
the judge said it was a "possible" custodial sentence that hall faced!!
don't know what someone has to do to get sent down.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#7
Brian
you have a small technical point that hes not v=been found guilty yet
but he has admitted all the 13 charges
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#8
brian/keith
he has been found guilty, we are only awaiting sentencing now.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#9
yes as i first said
it was brian who got it wrong
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#10
i sincerely hope that the judge takes the effect on the victims lives when he comes to sentence, i found this link quite harrowing.
not forgetting the 9 year old of course.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/02/stuart-hall-victim-never-forget-voiceKeith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#11
Whilst i agree with you howard we still reach he problem of over spilling prisons and the need to do something
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#12
I am sure he has not been tried yet,and it was a trial management hearing.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#13
we have been over this many times keith, the last time was over chris huhne being banged up in a luxury jail. the general concensus was that he should have got double the sentence.
give the harmless community work and put the evil (like stuart hall) in a cell to rot.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
#14
brian
every single t.v /radio station and news websites make it clear that the trial is over, do you know something they don't?
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
#15
ah ok howard,your right just read a report about the chap on sky news pages.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#16
thanks howard
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Terry Nunn
- Location: London Road, Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 4,321
#17
ACPO want to keep suspect's names secret. If that had happened Stuart Hall would never have been charged.
Terry
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#18
how bad is that
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
#19
# 17.......Correct....``One Sector`` of our society `is` being protected by this policy of the ACOP.........!!!!!.......
Jan Higgins- Location: Dover
- Registered: 5 Jul 2010
- Posts: 13,931
#20
I agree Terry but I have mixed feelings about suspects being named, it must be awful to have your name bandied about IF you are innocent because a little mud always sticks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I try to be neutral and polite but it is hard and getting even more difficult at times.
-------------------------------------------------------------------