I'm just in receipt of info that more happened with the DDC officer than was reported on this thread, so apologies from me for taking what was written and what is in the public domain on the DDC web site at face value and concluding as I did in my above post.
It transpires that the officer did a little bit more than inspect the area and report back that all would be cleared up on the normal routine day. I am informed that the officer spoke with the offending party and that the immediate situation was remedied with further clean up on the normal day.
So apologies for being a dreadful cynic, but comment can only really be made on the facts that are known, one cannot take into account unknown facts or be held accountable for leaving them out of a comment when they simply have not been made known.
As said previously - 'praise where praise is due' and it would seem that such is warranted on this occasion.