• The post you are reporting:
   
  Southern Cross had so many other issues it is not really realistic to make comparisons. And it is possible to cut costs without cutting services if the right research is done and people who are not performing are not expected to remain in place. A huge cost in the public sector goes on not being able to get rid of people who are not up to the job. I am not talking about random sackings and "cuts in staff" - I am talking about the massive drain on our taxes spent on staff who cannot do what the job requires. That is, in laymans terms, us as taxpayers funding carers who don't care, managers who can't manage, and nurses who we have all read about but who, largely because of unions and unrealistic employment law, retain their posts and go on to even more negligence and cruelty. Another huge waste of our money is on poorly targeted services that, if they were targeted better, would cost less and achieve more.

Report Post

Your Name

Reason