Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
So your saying alexander we sit back and allow people to die?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Dunno what you mean by that, Keith.
If a head of state threatens to blow up millions of people, where do I come into all this?
Only commenting on the thread.
Not sure if South Koreans are happy with the package being offered them by the leaders in the North, and not sure who is actually supposed to sit down and just die here. Wish I could figure out your question, Keith!
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
yes kieth,you hit the nail on the head.as off yet he hasnt threatnd us yet,well as far as i can make out.but if he dose sling a few missiles about it might solve a few problems.
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
If China fails to put its enfant terrible on a leash, the "Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea of October 1, 1953" might be invoked, giving the US the right to station forces in S. Korea; alternatively a few dozen cruise missiles on Kim's nuclear and military facilities might draw his teeth. If either happened, China would make a mighty fuss but be privately relieved.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Its fair to say the N Korean leader could be seen as a little unstable, and North/South Korea had been getting along but not now.
Should the news that N Korea may send a missle the USA way could escalate very quickly
And lots of lives lost.
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
thats only if it kicks off kieth,at the mo he is only jestering.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
The threats are there
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
a threat is not a threat untill they deliver kieth.and he hasent deliverd yet,just postering.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
I hope i wont be posting in the near future of ,,,,,,,, I told you so
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
It's unlikely NK has a missile/warhead combination that could deliver a nuclear weapon at all, let alone to the USA.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
hope your right peter
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
kieth,i will refer you to #28,i dont often repeat myself.but make an exception this time.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
King Jon Un (which translated from French means "the first") has threatened to kick off Monday tomorrow, or alternatively if South Korea and the USA hold their next - and imminent - round of joint military exercises.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
thats tonight then,because the yanks are down there now,firing blanks at each other.