Dover.uk.com
If this post contains material that is offensive, inappropriate, illegal, or is a personal attack towards yourself, please report it using the form at the end of this page.

All reported posts will be reviewed by a moderator.
  • The post you are reporting:
     
    ...and MPs would claim the same weekly subsistence for both their London and constituency home. Even if they could have been eating at both properties at one and the same time, would these claims be morally right?

    We cannot discuss Morality from such a narrow perspective as one man. A farmer in the Hindu Kush will wish to father many children for the benefits they bring. One of these children, had they been left to live, could have found a cure for Cancer or given birth to or fathered one such.
    I know you are annoyed, but are you anything more than annoyed Peter?

    It is either Morality for all or a 'free for all'.

Report Post

 
end link