Guest 655- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,247
#81
That is because David made a fair point Keith and while I disagreed it was a point worth answering. The responses given are the responses deserved.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
#82
Strange reply barryw
but ok
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
#83
Today I completed reading through "The End of Britain" published by Money Week.
It states:
"As the crisis deepens, panic will take hold. In a desperate attempt to pay off the debts and try to regain control, politicians will cast around for any sources of money available, and use almost any means to seize it."
"In other words, in times of financial panic, the government will come after the people with money and savings. If you are someone who has worked hard, been responsible, considered the future, thought about your family, planned for your old age, and built up savings and some wealth - you are the prime target."
Is this a feasible consideration? Any views?
