The post you are reporting:
here i go then,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Never having been a fan of maggie for obvious reasons without doubt she has to be respected for being a strong leader and looking after her own.
barryw;
whilst labour didnt get it all right, your dave is doing just as much to destroy this country.
so if you move out of your rose tinted glasses it would be fair to say all 3 parties are and have failed us.
on the miners dispute, you are corrcect arthur probably didnt do well in the way he organised his troops, maggie on the other hand learnt from mistakes and was well
able to take on the N.U.M.
barryw
again if you get into the dispute there were a number of n.u.m. intimidated by those that went back to work.
bern;
i'v asked the question before, im all for working together, but maggie made sure in her time of destroying nearly everyone, that the balance is heavily in favour of the employer, now whilst there can be some understanding of this, employers can use this just to make life for the employees that much more unbearable.
where unions exist and have negotiating rights, still the balance is in favour of the employer, nearly giving the unions next to no chance to disagree.
and of course bern when you get to the point of employer/trade union disagreeing then what do you suggest.?
quite important to have a level playing field, and an outcome
i could go on
but finanly to say i wont be watching the film