Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Dave1, I can't remember seeing digital dream, but I can remember having a lovely dream in broad daylight about a month ago! How lovely it was!
I had been telling people how happy I was. But a dream I suppose can still linger on, can't it!
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
A number of people have contacted me about Cameron since I was sacked and they all have a tale to tell and so does Companies House.
Your imagination couldn't even come near the truth.
Roger
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
probably best to keep it that way roger.
just in our collective imaginations.
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
But not for long Howard.
Roger
Guest 693- Registered: 12 Nov 2009
- Posts: 1,266
Good for you Rog. I await the details with great anticipation!
True friends stab you in the front.
Guest 651- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 5,673
Didn't Digital Dreams regularly deal in early/cheap digital camera on Ebay quite a lot ?
Been nice knowing you :)
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
There are a number of companies called Digital Dreams and similar, but it's only the ones involving Cameron that I'm interested in.
There are a number of other companies he's been involved in too that are also facing scrutiny.
Roger
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Well anyway, I had some imagination up and running, and it is still available!
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
ROGER
Your first postings on this was congratulating the new manager, but further postings are clear you still carrying a grudge, I do understand why, although we have at present have your side of the story(not that im disputing it)
but it would have been nice maybe for the c of c to come on here and defend there position.
On the evidence produced so far i'm unsure how the c of c could afford a wage above £9,500, the income isn't that high.
Whilst you now have a personal vendetta against some within the c of c I do wish the new manager well
he's probably going to need it
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
XXX
Roger
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
Just a gentle observation Roger
The point being, none of us probably think Spencer has taken this job on a salery of £9500, so whatever he is now on why wasn't Roger offered that!!!
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
PAUL
Whilst I agree with the content of your posting, and I don't distrust Rogers word, we do only have one side.
What I would like to see is someone from Chamber post on here giving the other side of this sorry saga
Agree Keith, would be good if they could state that Spencer has been taken on at no more than Roger was offered!!
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
PAUL
Other questions that wouldbe nice for chamber to answer;
1; in the chambers opinion was roger offered any more than the £9,500
2; In the chambers view,did they sack roger
3; Does the chamber feel this case has been handled well
4; with all the publicity what will the chamber do to correct the bad publicity
just a few things that would be nice to know
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
keith
on the face of it the chamber do not worry what people think.
comes across to me like another lodge.
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
howard
i'm ever the optimist
come on someone from chamber
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
forget it keith, be assured that ranks will be closed.
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
XXX
Roger
Guest 674- Registered: 25 Jun 2008
- Posts: 3,391
It does become difficult when you have one side of a story, and it would do the chamber all power to there elbow were they to put a statement on here.
Whilst I undestand barryw' wants to remain at a distance, I remain unclear if he supported the removal of Roger?
It's to easy to just wash your hands of the issue and say it's the chamber's issue and won't be discussed.
The problem with that is that people have already drawn there own conclusions.
I suspect barryw supported the removal of Roger as he has never disputed it.
And supports the incoming manager.
So for me this more about the chambers reputation(including barryw)
