Unregistered User
Then stop saying you are not political, it don't add up, as you have just proved.
Watty
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
thanks for misquoting me(not the first time)
what i have said is im no longer(and havnt been for some years)
in the council political arena
or in a political party
but i support the main thrust of the labour party
of course paulw
you know all this already
but it would be helpful not to misquote me
thankyou
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 671- Registered: 4 May 2008
- Posts: 2,095
Kieth.
I think what Paul is trying to say is, now you are not a councillor you should not "try to con the public or be credible". You should leave that to them.
I have a an amusing card in my car "Don't Steal, This Government Hates Competition"
"My New Year's Resolution, is to try and emulate Marek's level of chilled out, thoughtfulness and humour towards other forumites and not lose my decorum"
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
GARYC
Another good one was in dad's army
old jones kept saying to captain mannering
"they don't like it up um"
thanks for your comments garyc
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 653- Registered: 13 Mar 2008
- Posts: 10,540
I could keep arguing but do not see the point.
The sites search was not just carried out years ago, but as recent as last year, so things have not changed at all; there are no other sites.
Vic, whether you think it is 7 years too late or not, is irrelevant, I have followed this up every year since I've been an elected Councillor.
I am not in the game of lying, or exaggerating and whether you agree with Keith or not, makes no difference to the truth.
Roger
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
ROGER
I hope i'm misunderstanding your post and that you are not saying to vic that im lieing???
I think now that your leader DC is saying we need to move away from all this red tape, and compensation culture that we could look again at the sites.
The whole idea that play areas suddenly became unsafe overnight after years of enjoyment but children for years on end was part of this silly culture.
whilst all children should be protected wherever or when ever possible taking away play areas did little to help children in there growing up process,
Even at this very late stage i think it would be wise to know which sites were looked at last year by roger and why those sites were not able to be used
and were sites re visited that were suggested before and why were these rejected
thankyou
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
