Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
Lets hope Paul This is the case, im sure the developers will have done there homework on the selling of these houses and confident enough to do so.
We was told some years back the high speed train was going to change Dover, as warned didn't turn out to be the case.
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 698- Registered: 28 May 2010
- Posts: 8,664
Yes, quite. The jobs issue didn't stop all those new houses at Hawkinge being sold.
I'm an optimist. But I'm an optimist who takes my raincoat - Harold Wilson
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
I'm just trying to picture that amount of houses being built on the green land, and how it will look after,
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
full of houses kieth.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
Brian
Im interested to know if you feel its ok to build on any bit of land green or not?
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Peter 22
Different times, massif lending for buy to let investments
Would be interesting to see the numbers for housing benefit payments on these new projects.
Maybe we will see large amounts of ex Londoners selling up there old counsel house flats for big bucks and moving south.
Guest 904- Registered: 21 Mar 2013
- Posts: 312
Keith - this isn't green belt land. This is a former industrial site, previously used for the Channel Tunnel construction village and with roads left over from previous use of the site.
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
kieth,thats neither here or there,what I think is my business.
Guest 904- Registered: 21 Mar 2013
- Posts: 312
Keith Bibby wrote:
Would be interesting to see the numbers for housing benefit payments on these new projects.
And there was me thinking that social housing was a core issue for socialists, one that they had long campaigned for?
NIMBYism knows no political boundaries eh? All in it together, etc etc.
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
paul 27
So let it be for industry and jobs and let the housing go to Whitfield with the schools
Better to have industry on the transport links
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
pual post 29
Theirs social housing and social housing, if you expect people to work for £6 ph they need housing rents to be around £40 p/w not £100 + toped up on housing benefits from the taxpayers ,
The present system is just helping to enrich privet landlords supposedly supplying social affordable homes.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
Keith B
I hadn't picked up on your Socialist Ideals
aBrian
of course its your view but you did start to open up on them
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 904- Registered: 21 Mar 2013
- Posts: 312
Keith Bibby wrote:
The present system is just helping to enrich privet landlords supposedly supplying social affordable homes.
Would they be Hedge Fund Managers?
Oh, the name's Paul by the way Keith, not Peter - small point...
Guest 700- Registered: 11 Jun 2010
- Posts: 2,868
It never surprises me when planners give way to developers - and so it continues... there seems to be no land which is protected these days... the Channel Tunnel workers' village was surely a temporary affair...
---------------------------------------------------
Lincolnshire Born and Bred
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Keith s
Fairplay and democracy
This is probably why you will have me supporting justice for the poor that want to do the right thing, and attacking the greedy misusing taxpayer's cash. And loading the dice agent's the citizens to enrich themselves
In ukip we call it common-sense
It's not all black and white
ps. Your supposedly socialist labour party is supporting green EU taxes that will push up electricity bill by 20% that will push the poor over the edge.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
Hi Keith b
Remember before all this gets clouded
im just replying to posts.
Its good that you lookout for the poor and should be applauded but I do question if UKIP has the ability or people to change things, or even if it wants to.
Back on the thread, it is a little surprizing ex Cllr Richardson would probably benefit from the added houses or family members would.
But It will change the face of that area
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
Will wait for further comments from mr Richardson
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Keith s
Councillor Richards has removed his head from his ass, and dumped the conservative party ,giving him a brand new vision and understanding on the world ,
good on him welcome to the forum
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,948
His comments(mr Richardson) certainly wont be welcomed by his ex party?
but mr Richardson;s do tend to be nimby type of comments
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS