Guest 649- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 14,118
There is nothing wrong with how or what Mr Bibby is saying,he is puting his views over like we all do.some post you like some you do not, no issue with that is there?.If there is half or more of the members would not be posting at all goes for me aswell.
Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
how strange on the UKIP post 41 has the complete opposite view
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 715- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 2,438
Does anybody disagree with what Clair actually wrote?
Audere est facere.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
# 38.....Surely you jest.....dream on....when you wake up......there must be a `few` Party`s
you can still join..?.............
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
i think reg may be referring to the english defence league, they get a bad press - here is a meeting of their think tank.
Guest 710- Registered: 28 Feb 2011
- Posts: 6,950
#43
It wasn't that anybody could disagree with what CH wrote Martin. After all the same things are said here on a daily basis.
All wait patiently for repetition to morph into realisation.
Ignorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.
Guest 716- Registered: 9 Jun 2011
- Posts: 4,010
Spot on Howard........can you imagine a `nasty party`and a `hotch potch party`coalition......
