Paul Watkins wrote:Ray. Yes I was. To put it succinctly from memory. The Appeal was taken on advice from external Planning QC. I have nothing other to add .
I'm not surprised. I seem to remember from an earlier post that you sought to blame this fiasco on a secretary's minute taking. Who decided that the advice of a QC was necessary and on what basis? This thread is about the accountability of DDC's planning department and the influence of councillors and politicians upon it.
Here's a great chance for you to come to their defence over an incident that was a shocking waste of public money.
"I have nothing further to add". As I said, why am I not surprised.