Keith Sansum1
- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
have to stay under a labour govt then alexander as howards says
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Keith, this is a politics thread.
If Labour campaign to be voted, we can stand up and say: ...ahem...No!
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Keith, Labour is losing support by about 1% every week.
Their 10 point lead is now cut to 5 points. They are no longer in the 40's range, but are at 37%
Conservatives at 32%. Libs at 8%, UKIP at 14%. The poll is from yesterday, ComRes.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
always in the lead though alex and i suspect that ukip will hurt the blue vote enough to ensure that reds will take power in a bloodless coup in 2015 even if there are signs of recovery in the economy.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
summed up very well howard
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 710- Registered: 28 Feb 2011
- Posts: 6,950
I do not envy you having such dreams as these Howard.
Ignorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Once the UKIP electorate realise Labour would get in, Howard, they will demand an agreement with the Blues for a joint election pact. It would be party-suicide not to.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Tom a dream?
in reality as iv said before labour wont win outright but will be the largest party
you heard it here first
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Of-course Labour won't win , Keith, we all knew that!
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
All i say is I predicted some time ago
Watch now how it comes to reality
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 710- Registered: 28 Feb 2011
- Posts: 6,950
OK Keith, nightmare. Is that more like it?
Ignorance is bliss, bliss is happiness, I am happy...to draw your attention to the possible connectivity in the foregoing.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
you heard it on this thread first
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 745- Registered: 27 Mar 2012
- Posts: 3,370
Keih s you say
funny isnt it this seems ok by some as its anti labour!!!
But you're not happy that she's been parachuted in by her London masters ether keith!!!
Not democratic and all that stuff
Martin says it's all support for rape victims
They would have dun better apologizing to the victim for there open door policy's letting in rapists and murders and slave trader
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
Keith, Labour is currently on a downward slide.
Also, past opinion polls were not correct.
ConRes have changed their way of polling.
When asking people who they'd vote, they had been assigning to the three main parties (Tories, Labour and Libs) any unsure preference, such as a 5 out of 10 chance of voting for one of them, or 6 out of 10 chance and so on.
But they would only assign to the smaller parties a 10 out of 10 chance.
Now ComRes have decided to treat all parties equally.
The result was seen in their latest opinion poll the other day, done for the Mirror, in which the Libs got 8%, UKIP 14%, and Labour 37%.
The question is, how does YouGov conduct its polling methods, do they treat all parties in the same way?
In fact, there have been many questions recently as to why YouGov's polls are always low for UKIP and other smaller parties, and extremely high for Labour.
So, depending on how polls are conducted, people might think that only parties with a large rating are doing well, and consequently also vote for them, so as not to give a "wasted vote" .
If the polls are not calculated fairly in the first place, they can influence people's decision on how and whom to vote for.
So if Labour has been a beneficiary of this sort of poll conduct, it might explain a few things.
Brian Dixon
- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
cor an anti every thing thread,i'm anti ukip,tory and lib/dem.as a matter of fact i'm anti every thing evan stirling.
Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
true brian you appear to be
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Brian Dixon- Location: Dover
- Registered: 23 Sep 2008
- Posts: 23,940
@ kieth.
howard mcsweeney1- Location: Dover
- Registered: 12 Mar 2008
- Posts: 62,352
we can all choose our own opinion poll, this one today suggest that the two eds will raise the red flag over 10 downing street with clair being appointed deputy prime minister after putting charlie to the sword.
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/Keith Sansum1- Location: london
- Registered: 25 Aug 2010
- Posts: 23,942
Ed will get into number 10
but claire an charlie will be a very close run thing
ALL POSTS ARE MY OWN PERSONAL VIEWS
Guest 696- Registered: 31 Mar 2010
- Posts: 8,115
From Howard's link:
"so very much in line with the typical YouGov Labour lead of about 10 points." (Labour 43%. 11 more than Conservatives)
Strange, that YouGov are always giving Labour a typical 10 point lead over the Conservatives. It's been noted by poll analysts.
And they give the Libs 12%, and UKIP 9%.. This they do almost on a regular bases.
Yet what a contrast to ComRes from a day earlier (Libs 8 UKIP 14 Labour 37)!
Because it happens all the time on YouGov, something is definitely muddy in the poll ratings.
Neither do I give credence to YouGov's other percentages on questions that have been put over in their survey: these results might easily be questionable.
Looks something like a poll-shop.