• The post you are reporting:
   
  Whether he's a good guy or not, surely the basic premis is that if 50% of his (benefit) tenants are defaulting, but others are not, then he must want the best return on his investment and so not want to have tenants on benefits.
  
  I know there's no disgrace about receiving benefit, but the most important thing is keeping the roof over your head - isn't it ?
  
  Surely too, if the benefits were paid direct to landlord, he wouldn't lose out would he and the tenants would stay there ?
  
  
  
  Roger

Report Post

Your Name

Reason